The call in the 70’s in the end, I worked in company Italian multinational, was a pharmaceutical company, I was teen and worked 15 years in the department of data processing with a computer called Honewell Bull, I started to learn computing. I studied in high school, and my head was boiling in information. everything was bland was always in contact with new calls, translated and passed very well personally. they came ready and succinct little time he had a chance to talk some more. Then I went to mue group of friends (which unfortunately I had a good default, had several throughout the city) and discuss exactly these issues with them. One of the calls that concerned me most and has evolved until I choose not to psychology, was Burnout. Where I was at the Italian company was employee feedback about burnout. They just said about people who had sick leave for burnout. I was always careful about that. My recommendation is that I created was to travel. (If I’ve learned or created in the dark silence I do not know) But when I felt I was traveling near the burnout. Years later I read an immune to it. So within the friendship group of people came to the new call that was the Depression. I told myself immune, so I started hitting me with it stage by stage. Until I learned that depression is not fatigue. Needed to learn about how to become immune to depression. I always read books with authors who wrote and described the East Asia, the Buddhists. I decided to become a Buddhist, because I did not want to be a psychologist just to understand me, I decided that Buddhism had what I needed. Meditation. When he was in a meditation better than the doctors with their medicine. I left my upset because there was no prevention. I said in burnout because traveling is immune prevention. But for depression there is no prevention. Today I would say that I discovered another prevention. Physicians for a Depression Stress prevention, a call shortly after the call of Burnout. I laughed. I induced in my mind that if you do not swindles not make it to stress. It took me a long time with depression within the environment in the 90s. Conflict with a new technology that influenced the mind, depression led me to experience stress. In the new call schizophrenia, I did well. Because in 2002 I decided to take matter to me degree in education, and the need to do college work, the library, I just read an article. Explaining that the epilepsy report was based on depression. I could not get schizophrenia. Because even in the environment, or anyone if I stay away from stress, environmental schizophrenia could not reach. But the so-called schizophrenia environment I wanted to learn, not prcisou walk the corridors of the hospice or the offices of psychologists that whenever I showed up they told me to go since the 90’s by saying that I had no problems whatsoever. I was insistent and I think that each phase was about 4 different psychologists as well as always being close to the Institute of Psychology. But the environment has been called schizophrenia persist. And I began to conflict because I could not talk about young people’s time as build built for me calls. The conflict grew until teaching in 2007, the problems have improved. The conflict has decreased and the need to see psychiatrists and psychologists over. Schizophrenia environmental was have an answer for me. Within a Scientific American article. Or article caught my attention because I do not have a theme to give my students to build an interdisciplinary character with writing since I was a substitute teacher of organic chemistry of them. I needed a text interdisciplinary organic chemistry and biology. And text appeared in Scientific American that was the real gift. The identification with the text came to me regardless of class, because it was hot topic with a friend from university who had his work theme RNA. We talked about her work in the blood of patients with pulmonary infections at a university near my house. She was the university I studied and used the collected but the university laboratories close to my house. And the magazine article was very easy to understand. I remembered the issues and answer my questions. What came first the DNA or RNA. And throughout the article described the problem of keeping the code described in RNA to its end for the construction. The students had their work theme that helped him understand organic chemistry and the problem of human reproduction in biology. They just need to read and do a review, the rest we would discuss the measure we were having classes in organic chemistry. For me it was important they see the complex of RNA and DNA but they never would for example the importance of learning the format description of amines and amides. Has any base. But the peace of mind and emotional and spiritual, came when I saw the article I responded on the environment as a conceptual schizophrenia. Without you think about nuclear disaster. That is, if the DNA building the environmental code of schizophrenia had contact RNA to bring the code to nominate its construction of the road suffered a single disorder could make the protein Schizophrenia. At the time a nuclear disaster would be enough to generate a confusion in the construction of RNA and protein to the cell. The RNA would come disorganized abnormal protein, the cell would be the modification of human behavior. she would now be a cell with genetic traits of schizophrenia. The cancer has this problem. Schizophrenia could trace this path. But the years passed and completed nuclear disasters was still very strong and very weak. Because a disaster could not only make the mismatch of the set of atoms RNA molecule, as if it were too strong could do the destruction. Would that be something less than the destructive and strong enough to make small modifications. The disruption of RNA molecules is as difficult as breaking fat into energy, proteins are large but disorganized one atom is enough to change their characteristics and outcome. But one characteristic that is modified small changes can lead to the end of the cell body and its function and then behavior. The article below, shows another connection and continuity to me that I read the article SBPC (Brazilian society research and science – Magazine “Ciencia Hoje”), which was written in the 90s. Depression that had a link with epilepsy. But he also shows this link with epilepsy and schizophrenia. Then I’d say a slight environmental influences on the line of the genetic code of DNA to RNA to protein to produce schizophrenia or depression. If we made a graph, could put the protein in the center of epilepsy in the human body if there was a basis for this code. And then a single malfunction in the production code on Schizophrenia and Depression and the other around the epilepsy report. Depending on the influences could give the diversion of construction genetic depression or epilepsy. We have today in my mind many environmental influences that are not only the nuclear disaster for changes. Something like a disaster or environmental imbalance chemistry, biochemistry could cause the code to the environmental influences that RNA carries. Consider the text of Scientific American, he denounces the question about which came first the DNA or RNA? if we see that the possibility of exchange of one or the other on the idea which came first, then we can infer that DNA is the base to the RNA, the RNA could be the basis for future DNA. The DNA in the body is not eternal. When it was built or replace the ancient DNA, even if it was tough making the old code, if their RNAs were deconstructed in the way of an influence before arriving at the Ribosome to build protein. An hour of this construction would work for the modified DNA sequence of modified RNAs. Consider the replacement of the old DNA is modified by the risk of not having a reliable basis to ensure that RNA had the primary code of DNA. In other words, DNA makes RNA and has the consciousness that his successors will do the inserted RNA. RNA that comes through the next DNA. If a sequence of RNA to produce different proteins than RNA wanted to have the time to do a DNA DNA without the guarantee of RNAs that would prime DNA. If the DNA produces an RNA loaded code that produce proteins that lead to epilepsy. If a modifier sequence that occurs is small, epilepsy is no longer epilepsy. Is it something that can be linked around. Everyone around has its primary design. Chemistry would be an observation of the heroine  -  Morfine, of the amino acid  – AMINA. A single change in the whole of Amina transforms into another type of amino acids. Returning once again changed the code of the RNAs produce epilepsy report their resulting proteins, but when the DNAs were produced to be replaced they would not have a basis. Their RNAs produced cells that produced so different DNAs. A stage in the evolution. A mutation. Paleontology that would be easier to observe. For the historical period I have small complex bodies. A genetic disorder in these small bodies produce new modified bodies. When they reproduce bodies produce modified with modified DNA. But it would be a modification corpuscular. Playback. In paleontology would be ideal because they are small bodies and in world history I tenhoa bulk catastrophic events that could show a decline in the production of RNAs. For example, a DNA producing their RNAs usually take an ice age in the beginning, or a meteor fall near each other, heavily laden with radiation. That would make an influence on DNA and its construction of RNAs. The base has been lost over the modification would not be as Darwin demonstrates corpuscular evolving. But paleontologists but genetics, evolution corpuscular something less. If we had a specimen with epilepsy in the DNA code, and this has environmental action of the fall of a radioactive meteor near the body. This would change the design of the RNA. Or a change in the code designed by the RNA and DNA in a change of the code at the time of RNAs and protein production of a differentiation of the protein before. Events as may exist paleontology. Help to understand? For example, described the Russian idea of ​​modeling the growth of direct sunlight. It is followed by explosions and electromagnetic anomalies, these explosions suceed  the interference in the Earth system. The anomaly is an example of electromagnetic solar anomaly. But there are anomalies in the rate of cosmic rays, gamma rays more. All influence in terrestrial systems. From the artificial to the natural. If we take the anomalous event dysfunction last year’s big sunspot is modified with a large solar flare. Obvious influences that sparked a flame in the atmosphere for example. Or the geomagnetic Earth system, or electronic systems. All influence our system corpuscular We can, living a moment paleontology. We would have to relive the database for children born in 2010. Not to mention the future of these Darwinian to mate in the future and create new human would have to see if a genetic level from 2009 to 2010 there was a slight non-genetically modified. A modification that would generate a replacement based on the future of DNA in your body. For the two levels of paleontology would have drawn in the future, a genetic body and another for playback. In 20 years all the combinations would play a very small change in the future geologic time, but great for older models of scientific understanding. Why? Data are needed. Now we produce the database in blood (Mitochondrial DNA) by the millions. But a paleontological expedition would have no more than a thousand global view if we had a good conversation between scientists around the world based on stratigraphic good time. Would have to get a reliable period, that this gives enough samples and worldwide have these stratigraphic ranges. And then the collection would be done. And would you describe the vision and genetics to the study of catastrophic event similar to the present. The analysis would be parallel. The text below is instructive. Deserves due attention.

Darwin’s Dangerous Idea : Born Equal (BBC)

Video in link below:

http://www.youtube.com/v/KdrpgcMaPB4

Good Week

Benedito Ubirata

This article explains a little call for concern with the issue reversal of moral values ​​to the older. The year the values ​​that had called the elders in a society, lost to the devaluation, and concern only and exclusively monetary and economic policy. Killing and despise their elders would be perhaps the revolution and not evolution darwin darwian. For Darwin the older animals would be if they were human contempt because they were weaker. And Darwin in evolution are always the weak and defeated by the community of animals discarded by the stronger. This could give way to a genetic view that only relies on combinations of biochemical evolution over time. But genetics also adds the knowledge acquired by previous animal. That is, if the acquired knowledge and previous animal survives even being more fragile, their offspring will add knowledge through genetics. Noting that the common animal. Now if you look at the human animal, that being older can not be dismissed as nowadays they are being disregarded.
Perhaps the article demonstrates this. He has only one premise, the observation paleontology. But you can look at other premises of the contamination present, the past 30 years of human will want to Darwinism but not in the conceptual opposition creationist versus evolutionist like watching and perhaps allowed themselves to divert attention, because it seems like just a trap of media to a prevailing social and economic plan does not take responsibility for class of human that only older can receive their pensions, creating a symbolic battle between religious and scientists so imbecile as diverting attention to the political level to consolidate. In the single fact worked a lifetime to sustain and keep the children alive. And acquired knowledge and at this stage can still collaborate with their ability to assimilate knowledge. This might explain why in the days when the plans started strongly in the system from 1986 to 1987 after taking some introductory books on philosophy in the old law office of my cousin in Mogi Mirim, a small town in Brazil. Some topics such as hypocrisy, demagoguery, existentialism, innateness, Socrates, Aristotle, philosophical thought versus scientific thinking, what most upset him was the empirical, or experience, writing briefly.
Other topics were placed, as phenomenology, and experimentalism that I reviewed almost all the university with observation of the physical sciences that a lot of practice the experimental, something that does not like to think  but in the 90’s they were discussing something that worked very well. But what most marked the 80 in this discussion was empiricism. I was naive, I was more concerned with getting ready for the university to realize the influence that began to mark with concern to the elderly.
I was able to talk even in the 80’s that I liked to live with their elders, and had no problems with them, a trademark was brought from my childhood.
But did not realize the call of concern and selection of those who do not always leave out the older (and not even realize that I practiced the protection of older and had been selected).
After this concern with the elderly would be easier in college I could not stay away from them (the gerontocracy), my questions were too heavy and caused non-existent projects, was called a pioneer in the corners of the university in all I move, and Obviously the older ones always gave me the base. Over time, I could not see what happened in contrast to my childhood and adolescence, which was the loss of human sensitivity to the elderly in the society outside the university, my time in it were consumed by almost every year, I lived in it all day and sometimes at night and dawn (extended periods within the Electronic Computing Center, then inside the laboratories of geology (mineralogy and hydrogeology miscroscopia) and then the phase is more modest than in the experimental phase field in lakes and rivers with hydrology and engineering geology, with the rest of sampling within my practice area dedicated to the sport. It was a convenient marriage between leisure, sport, science and education, and experimentation at this stage I am completely removed from society, almost ten years.
The cries about it long and Gerontology were everywhere, generated internal conflicts, until I came across institutionally with the need for destruction of the institution that there was an elder. The so called gerontrocacia older class that could collaborate with the young in experience was beginning to grow again and making me to new conflicts.
As in the early 90’s these speeches I made against my internal conflicts to my observations were only considered as acts of malicious and ulterior motives to protect me from what I considered persecution.
I took a silence, submission accepted the idea that I was under the persecution mania and I went back to strengthen and rebuild me. At that time I not only realized the devastating force of a growing company in the way of thinking in all places and media, and as I began criticizing in order to feel less fragile, I was criticized by many people that I used this speech as be an excuse to hide that I was not. It was a clever way to marginalize those who perceived negative psychological social waves everywhere, my base was perception of human behavior. I lived with many foreigners to the country, I talked to almost all social classes. I taught computer graphics in a rich neighborhood in the state capital where he lived, I lived and studied abroad, I rode the bus and went to the bars of the simplest classes and poor, and traveled widely to the rural economy (the lucky or unlucky I studied the course, geology).
Today 15 years later, is so visible that it was not a persecution, that even the older more powerful felt threatened that they are missing their consciousness of the need for a systematic almost sensitive psychosocial wave of extermination of the older just to make survive the public purse can not afford the cash values ​​and benefits to older retirees, or who want to continue to serve with their knowledge.
In my country, a former governor of a state to the south of this, had to borrow money from the World Bank can meet the payments of its retirees and pensioners, the elderly, many constitutions laws change with the older more unjust in contrast old.
End Mania chase.
It was a chase, yes, those speeches contained strong warning to the systematic disregard of the oldest major.
In the 90s I was a student at a major university and a good ability to reason, I could become a political leader and this could be the end to put plans in order that other people had the ability to manipulate the consciences of population. I left the plane to contrast the speeches even though the director of an academic center and with other favorable points curriculum and was trying to survive.
The reality that makes me happy is that in less time, I thought, there are already plans to replace the society, the deepest thoughts of psycho social, withdraw from society based on Darwinian thinking to the political thought of infuence manipulated or not Society.
Darwin has no relation to policy and public administration, is genocide.
He can only have their models related to the lower animals, they do not have the intelligence to make them negotiate, study, develop their skills.
They survive only by instinct if not by genetic evolution of their ancestors will always be decimated natural disasters or unnatural. We do not sometimes survive natural and unnatural disasters in just one generation. Not waiting instincts are built by the generations that have emerged as Darwin explains the survival of a species.
The human species survive a catastrophe independent of the instincts. Sometimes in less than a generation, the problem she sees, feels, if you let down and is restored.
Consider the development of natural and unnatural pandemics or infections. These are made by human error, or natural appearance of microorganisms, where the solution happens without that decrease the population in less than a generation. As an example we have the Spanish Flu, or bubonic plague, flu versus swine.
The first decimated the human population, if by Darwin, we would have to kill the most fragile with the flu and the plague generations and leaving the strongest to generate a new class of human strengths to it, to disappear.
On the contrary it made it disappear in less than a generation. Without the extermination of the weak, manufacture the medicines and vaccines and vitamins. We entered the prevention and remediation. When the model of Darwin, he presents the evolution preventative in animals?
We do not see remedial action.
The introduction of political discussion and elimination of the view that Darwin and evolution in the human species is good to see if the plan terminates once moronic devaluation of the older empiricism.
For those who enjoy movies or cinematrográficas arts, perhaps the influence of concern in my speech that system jerk anti gerontocratic (on older ones) could see the movie that I watched to 8 years old, I think it was a good influences on this topic, there are other more important topics in this film can be seen that this view is idiotic action by the Darwinian older. The movie “Soylent Green” (1973) director Richard Fleischer adapted a novel by Harry Harrison, with the famous Charlton Heston and Leigh Taylor-Young.
See the poster below:

See the video below.

See the construction of ecological living by Darwin, a group of animals, eg deer found in Africa, where it escape from predators, the stronger and more young people come out ahead because they are more agile and more purposefully leave gazelles frail and older back. They leave the deer just for predators to have the older as food and satiation. Will be satisfied and go away leaving them unmolested. On this view Darwin is a Darwinian model that well represents the evolution in the animal world. The strongest survive, and leave your strength in genetic code that left him alive. This will become instinct regarding genetic influence on behavior.
The exception to the rule of the animals to predators and preyed but strong, is only in the case of these predators wanting to take the puppies in rare excetions. In this case the strongest may have an intervention. The female becomes violent and even more agile to escape it returns to save the puppy. This applies well to Darwin because this makes the species is protected from extinction.
Feel inside Darwinnist calls to mind the latest political thought since there is a movie that was also called as the air after it was published the year. The film is the opposite of the first concern but it is interesting because he tries to mend the damage already installed reviewing a big mistake in Soviet culture in the Second World War. This shows that already in the 90 sets in the despair of something lost control and then you are starting to worry about the younger ones. I realized that connotation with the recall of religious institutions to the great movement of Catholic renacenstist phase with the concern of the child and the society then showed Jesus Christ in your cults like the baby Jesus. Something happened at the time that the Church was concerned, and puts the propaganda that gave birth to the movement of the Jesuits. Something learned in the classroom at the university, a reminder. For Education is learned that this movement is a revolution in education of human beings at the time. One begins to worry about education. And this concern can be seen in all media in the 90’s with great force that reaches out to the Media … for example I just assuming something that I always had skill, care for girls, something always easy as a child with my little aunts …
The film is beautiful, and teaches history and Soviet culture in the 40s in the middle of World War II despite novel is a true fact, and the director tries to focus on something that clearly seems to have taken courses to return as culture. I think this may have happened please. The observations suggest that the central figure already discussed might have been placed as a cultural practice. I realize this because I had a deceased brother, we were both students university public in Brazil. Both were very strong to survive the negative cultural impacts was established, and many complained. Not so with many others was always discussed the erroneous idea of ​​parents choosing to have children a stronger and preferable for failing in their despair, all lead to the survival of a catastrophe, or any large problem happened. My mother gave an educational trend not to differentiate the two had the same chances and were forced to be strong without penalty at the same time and resistents. I had to treat one another and more. The film shows clearly that the interim but should see hysteria existing collective unconscious in the 90 and 2000. If you see that with these films, which was already discussed in a research setting in psychology and education of children and the issue of differentiation of education either. Introdution becomes strongly in all media … Even away from him. Something happens that cares so well with children.
In my view is the imbecility of the Darwinian model that had seen hysteria of those who are powerful in-depth see something already hysterical and inserted in the society in which they teem to manage. They fund projects for extensive observation of children’s topic.
Watch the movie “Attack on Leningrad” (2009) director Aleksandr Buravsky with Gabriel Byrne and Mira Sorvino.See the poster below:

See the video below:
But for humans that would be stupid, discard the oldest. Let the elders to predation and just run for the youngest would be after a while not knowing which is the crucial tool to protect human beings. In humans, as you know that knowledge is something much more valuable for example the high speed of a gazelle to the predator, or by the cold, just using the intelligence, and stuck with the oldest who holds the knowledge of how to quickly and instantly memory of something called a civilization.
Finally, humans do not have the older ones would have to be using the same search time ever, “rediscovering the wheel” because it would have an older one around, just to say that it worked or not something in the past. The library, the older, reading books and writing are memories. They are sacred records.
Read “The Name of the Rose” Umberto  Eco, and see what I had to rarefy as called in the 80’s. Do not just watch the content of whodunit as the film shows and many lead only to see it. This is the error. Aristoteles, the verb, the laughter, the Italian Dante is commoner raised in Italy, Latin as a tool, and the aisles of a library holds the secret at all that can be said of these troubled times, reading, language, and not target language (which incidentally is the error of the popular saying that would mimic the metalanguage they want to induce young people and police, the meta-language that comes from my basic education is the meta-mathematical language, with “therefore”, “any that is, “” equals <=> “,” equal =, “” less -, “” more, “all they need in their writing to code quickly and give their written notes for their reports summarized in the report).
This book is an induction of the Italian Umberto Eco editor to publish what he had then that was a giant text study and research, an essay in Media.
A good article below containing yes, good information. I hope it becomes again a call one day for the younger more enlightened.

Note: If you have a message for me on economics. Forget it, I got that message, with the military dictatorship in 1976 prohibiting the discipline in universities in Brazil and Latin I think the chair of Political Economy) at the time I did a short course to enter the school of the Air Cadets when my math teacher interrupted class to communicate more of a dictatorship at the time was that such a ban. All we had 13 years. And we are watching and obviously traumatized. There was no mention of this in the classroom in regular school. It was a refresher course for the military had not The prevalence of cassation. We could hear.
The message, I was given the same time I ate a big plate caiçara, there at the port of Santos, which was Mecca. This message was given to me as fondly despite the military I was creating a strong critic of the military regime. I grew up in criticism of them. My uncle was in the military police dictatorship. And I strongly criticized. When I was 19 in 1983, an admiral, Admiral Karan tells his nephew the son of the former Financial Director of the State Attorney General where I worked, this one. A discussion of editing Marx seized in the 70’s entitled “Political Economy” and has in its collection.
A work done in the Faculty of Law University of São Paulo in 1969 by Professor Pinto Fagundes and printed in the administration of former director of the Center for Academic XI August A. J. Luciano. A worthy gift for someone who years later also became director of an Academic Center at the University Sao Paulo and did not realize at the time that would be such.
Please “Political Economy”, but “Geopolitics” is not. This is what I use to understand how to play almost everything I see and let me bore in terms of international politics and not something else internationally.
Geopolitics is a matter that I had to necessarily have to study, because by the time I got the book I was a staunch critic of the late Professor Hemerit Milton Santos he had geopolitics. He did, was that I did have to study this matter that both staunchly argued while he was alive and I was a student of geology. Geopolitics was only a point of peace between me and him. Because when he came in the genetic matter, he did a lot of people argue with him when I was close. He then did not accept the rules of the projection that many of us had to go. Take long for him to accept. These discussions have led me to learn a lot about the behavior aside racial, genetic and gerontology. To argue that studying was much talk with many people at the university. But old is good and this is another one that I miss the old. He avenge one of the good sides of a good project that the Brazilian university could do. I hope that one day they rescue.

Good Week

Benedito Ubiratã