Some politicians forget that African descent who participated in the American Civil War, were slaves, but slaves were not helped when. They fought by parents and masters were regarded as free. These politicians call for collaboration african descent but end up breaking the Constitution itself, forget that slavery is against the law, and transform the collaboration in slavery, where the gain and only what you have. This is slavery, be unlawful. So participating in this ritual but not ask to be recognized, not being seen, or be known. To not be charged. This story of suffering and deception is decimating the world population over 20 years of requests for favors in manipulation of our emotional side. Be a crime.

They manipulate our emotions, let us ask for emotional warmth with more and more collaboration and always leave us with no political base and we always end up being persecuted and killed. This ritual will still make a big stage is just like the last great phase in the planet. Slavery through a ritual of human emotive employees and kills them without social recognition. If so decimated the population that actually produces intellectually be so small that everyone is getting sick of fatigue, with the excuse that is dwindling by elements of a natural anomaly. Just be the result of human slavery by politicians and people who take advantage of our existence. The calculations are good at revenge, will have no economy, or society that can sustain themselves with this mode of vision. Each major phase adjustments are giant bankruptcies economic systems.

The last was in 2009, will take will not have another. And it will be higher.

Read Full text?

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/additional-publications/civil-war/p20.htm

Black Dispatches

Union officers got so many valuable pieces of intelligence from slaves that the reports were put in a special category: “Black Dispatches.” Runaway slaves, many of them conscripted to work on Confederate fortifications, gave the Union Army a continually flowing stream of intelligence. So did slaves who volunteered to be stay-in-place agents.
Tens of thousands of ex-slaves fought and died for the Union in military units. Less known is the work of other African-Americans who risked their lives in secret, gathering intelligence or while entering enemy territory as scouts. Brigadier General Grenville M. Dodge mentioned how he used black scouts during a search for Confederate troops in Tennessee: “Two negroes led our cavalry to them, guiding them around their pickets. No white man had the pluck to do it.”
Throughout the official records of the war, there are frequent references to bits of intelligence coming from “contrabands.” The term tracks back to a demand for runaway slaves from a Virginia slaveowner who cited the Fugitive Slave Law when he learned that his slaves had fled to Union territory. Responding, Major General Benjamin Butler said that since secession, Virginia had not been under federal law. Butler referred to the slaves as “contraband of war,” and the term caught on.
In a typical report: “Three contrabands came in from Fort Johnson yesterday. They were officers’ servants, and report, from conversation of the officers there, that north and northwest faces of Fort Sumter are nearly as badly breached as the gorge wall, and that many of our projectiles passed through both walls, and that the fort contains no serviceable guns.”
George Scott escaped from a plantation near Yorktown and headed for Fort Monroe, at the mouth of the James River on the tip of the Virginia peninsula. On the way, he noted two large fortifications. To gather more intelligence, Scott joined a Union officer on scouting missions. On one such mission, Scott was the target of a Confederate picket, whose bullet missed Scott’s body, but put a hole in his jacket. Another slave worked on the defenses of Leesburg. He escaped, bringing with him his detailed observations about the deployment of 5,000 Confederate troops. Many other slaves provided similar information about Confederate plans and maneuvers.
While Allan Pinkerton was serving as Major General George D. McClellan’s intelligence chief, the private detective ordered a careful debriefing of runaway slaves, some of whom he personally recruited to go back as agents. One of Pinkerton’s black agents was John Scobell of Mississippi, who had been educated and freed by his owner. Scobell used the cover of servant to two other Pinkerton agents, Timothy Webster and Carrie Lawton, when they operated in Richmond. Scobell also posed as a cook and a laborer on his trips south, where he often signed up black couriers for the Union at secret meetings of the Legal League, an underground slave organization.
Another black spy for Pinkerton was W. H. Ringgold, a free man who had been forced to work on a Virginia riverboat that was moving Confederate troops and supplies. After about six months, he and the other crewmen were allowed to return to the North. Debriefed by Pinkerton, Ringgold told all he knew about Confederate fortifications on the Virginia peninsula. When McClellan began his peninsula campaign in March 1862, the best intelligence he had was from Ringgold.
The Union Navy also profited from Black Dispatches. Robert Smalls, a free African American who was a harbor pilot knowledgeable about Fernandina, Florida, noticed that Confederates were preparing to destroy the harbor as they withdrew. He realized that Fernandina would provide the Union with a good port for blockade ships patrolling Charleston.
In March 1862, Smalls rowed out to a Union warship and reported what he had seen. The fleet, waiting to attack Fernandina, moved swiftly before the damage was done and captured the port. In another instance, Smalls loaded his family and other African-American sailors aboard a Confederate patrol ship in Charleston, calmly gave the correct countersigns to Confederate signals as he sailed her out of the harbor, and surrendered her to a Union blockade ship. He and the crew were rewarded with half the value of the captured ship.
Mary Touvestre, a freed slave, worked as a housekeeper for one of the Confederate engineers who were repairing the U.S. Navy’s Merrimac. The steam-powered frigate had been partially burned on April 21, 1861, when Federal forces abandoned the Gosport Navy Yard. Rebuilt as an ironclad, she was renamed the C.S.S. Virginia. Touvestre overheard the engineers talking about the ship and realized its significance as a weapon against the Northern blockade. Traveling at great risk with a stolen set of plans, she made her way to Washington and got an audience with officials in the Department of the Navy.
Surprised by the momentum of the Confederate project, the officials speeded up the building of the Union ironclad, the Monitor. Some historians believe that if the former slave had not carried her warning to Washington, the Virginia might have had several unchallenged weeks for a rampage against vulnerable Union ships, thwarting the blockade long enough for the arrival of desperately needed supplies from Europe.
Harriet Tubman, one of the nation’s most famous African-Americans, was also one of the war’s most daring and effective spies. She is renowned as a conductor of the Underground Railroad. Her espionage work, like that of many black spies, is far less known. But her exploits, centered along the South Carolina coast, are well documented, mostly because they were military operations.
Early in 1863, after she had spent nearly a year caring for refugee slaves, Union officers in South Carolina decided that she would be more valuable as a covert operative. She was asked to assemble a small reconnaissance unit of ex-slaves who knew the region and could gather timely intelligence. She found nine men, some of them riverboat pilots who knew every inch of the waterways threading through the coastal lowlands. One of her tasks was the finding of “torpedoes,” as remotely-detonated mines were called then, placed along the waterways patrolled by Union river craft.
Her spying and scouting evolved into a kind of special forces operation under Colonel James Montgomery. A fervent believer in guerrilla warfare, Montgomery was a veteran of antislavery border fighting in Kansas. Like Tubman, he had met and admired firebrand abolitionist John Brown.
In July 1863, Tubman became Montgomery’s second-incommand during a night raid up the Combahee River, near Beaufort, South Carolina. The Union gunboats, carrying some 300 black troops, slipped up the river, eluding torpedoes that Tubman’s men had spotted. Undetected, the raiders swarmed ashore, destroyed a Confederate supply depot, torched homes and warehouses, and rounded up more than 750 rice plantation slaves.
“The enemy,” said a Confederate report on the raid, “seems to have been well posted as to the character and capacity of our troops … and to have been well guided by persons thoroughly acquainted with the river and country.” Unwittingly, the report was praising the work of slaves working for Tubman.
Reporting on the raid to Secretary of War Stanton, Brigadier General Rufus Saxton said, “This is the only military command in American history wherein a woman, black or white, led the raid, and under whose inspiration. it was originated and conducted.” Tubman’s spies added to the heroic chronicles of the Black Dispatches. “This source of information,” said one historian, “represented the single most prolific and productive category of intelligence obtained and acted on by Union forces throughout the Civil War.”
One of the boldest—and least known—Northern spies of the war was a free African American who went under cover as a slave in what appears to have been a plan to place her in the official residence of Confederate President Jefferson Davis.
The residence, called the Richmond White House, served as the Davis home and the President’s executive office. While he conducted Confederacy business there, he would not have seen his slaves as a threat to security. Official papers did not have to be given special protection when slaves were around because, by law, slaves had to be illiterate.
Elizabeth Van Lew well knew this law, and, while running her spy ring in Richmond, realized the espionage value of a slave who was secretly able to read and write. Van Lew had a perfect candidate for such an agent-inplace role: Mary Elizabeth Bowser.
The wealthy Van Lew family, which had 21 slaves in 1850, had only two by 1860—both of them elderly women. Yet, Virginia and Richmond archives show that the Van Lews had not gone through the legal procedures for the freeing of slaves. Freedom meant exile. Under Virginia law, freed slaves had to leave Virginia within a year after winning their freedom. Only by ignoring that law could Van Lew carry out the audacious placement of an agent in the Richmond White House.
Elizabeth Van Lew and her widowed mother Eliza raised the eyebrows of their social acquaintances in Richmond in 1846 by having a slave baptized as Mary Jane Richards in St. John’s Episcopal Church, revered as the site where Patrick Henry said, “Give me liberty or give me death.” Later, Elizabeth sent Mary Jane off to Philadelphia for an education. In 1855, Mary Jane sailed to Liberia, the African nation founded by Americans as a colony for ex-slaves.
On March 5, 1860, a ship bearing Mary Jane Richards arrived in Baltimore. She went on to Richmond—an illegal act for a freed slave. Five months later, she was arrested for “perambulating the streets and claiming to be a free person of color….” She was briefly jailed and released after Elizabeth Van Lew paid a $10 fine and claimed that Mary Jane was still a slave. This declaration would give her perfect cover as an agent. Mary Jane Richards married and became Mary Elizabeth Bowser. It is under that name that she enters Civil War espionage history.
Information about her is scanty. One good source is Thomas McNiven, who posed as a baker while making daily rounds as a Van Lew agent in Richmond. From him, down the years, came the report that she “had a photographic mind” and “Everything she saw on the Rebel President’s Desk, she could repeat word for word.”
Jefferson Davis’ widow, Varina, responding to an inquiry in 1905, denied that the Richmond White House had harbored a spy. “I had no ‘educated negro’ in my household,” she wrote. She did not mention that her coachman, William A. Jackson, had crossed into Union lines, bringing with him military conversations that he had overheard. In a letter from Major General Irvin McDowell to Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton, “Jeff Davis’ coachman” is cited as the source of information about Confederate deployments. A butler who served Jefferson Davis also made his way to Union lines.
Although McDowell and other Union generals could attest to the value of the Black Dispatches, the best endorsement came from General Robert E. Lee. “The chief source of information to the enemy,” he wrote, “is through our negroes.”

The Conductor Becomes a Spy

Harriet Tubman

Harriet Ross was born into slavery in Maryland in 1819 or 1820. She was whipped when she was a small child, and, when she was 15 years old, was struck on the head by a scale weight hurled at a slave she was helping escape. The injury produced a lifelong suffering from headaches and seizures. When she was 25 years old, she married John Tubman, a free African-American. About four years later, when her master died, she feared that she and her kin would be sold and scattered. So she began to think about escaping. Her husband declined to go with her, as did her brothers.
The courage and skill she used in her escape she would later use again as a spy for the Union.
Harriet Tubman fled to the North on the Underground Railroad, the network of abolitionists who helped slaves make their way to freedom. After freeing herself, she returned to Maryland, became a conductor on the railroad, and brought out members of her family. She made a score of dangerous trips, helping some 300 slaves reach the North. With each trip, she taught herself the ways of covert work behind enemy lines.
In 1857, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Dred Scott, a black man who had moved from a free state to a slave state, had no right to sue for his freedom because African-Americans could not be citizens; the court also ruled that Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories. The decision emboldened slaveholders and put Tubman in even more jeopardy. But, in that same year, she slipped into Maryland and conducted her elderly parents to freedom.
Because of fugitive slave laws, escapees could find ultimate freedom only in Canada. Tubman went frequently to the main underground terminal in Canada, St. Catherines, Ontario. There she met John Brown, who told her of his plans for an armed raid on Harpers Ferry. She later said that if she had not been ill at the time, she would have joined in the raid.
Tubman went to war in May 1861, joining a Union force dispatched to her native Maryland, which was a hotbed of Southern sympathizers. There, she knew, her knowledge of the land would be helpful to Union troops. Later, she served in the Union’s Fort Monroe in Virginia. But it would be at her next duty post, in South Carolina, that she would become a full-fledged undercover operative.
In the spring of 1862, Tubman sailed from New York City to Beaufort, South Carolina, the operations center for Union forces that held the southeastern coast of South Carolina. She was sent to the region at the suggestion of Massachusetts Governor John Andrew, who believed that “she would be a valuable person to operate within the enemy’s lines in procuring information & scouts.”
The Union-held area was a magnet for slaves fleeing to freedom. Tubman helped to clothe and feed them while also setting up agent networks and conferring with Union officers, including Colonel James Montgomery. He made her his second-in-command for the night raid up the Combahee River that freed more than 750 plantation slaves.
After the war, Harriet Tubman lived on a small farm in Auburn, New York. Years before, William A. Seward, then an anti-slavery senator from New York—later to be Lincoln’s Secretary of State—had sold her the property and arranged for a mortgage. She continued to help exslaves and black veterans and supported the crusade for women’s suffrage. In 1869, two years after the death of John Tubman, she married Nelson Davis, an ex-slave whom she had met when he was a Union soldier.
Citing her work for the Union Army, especially the Combahee River raid, she petitioned for a pension. A member of Congress who had been a Union general backed her claim, noting “her services in the various capacities of nurse, scout, and spy.” But not until 1890, two years after the death of Davis, did she receive a pension of eight dollars a month. By then, she was in poverty, and neighbors were providing her with food. Nine years later, her monthly pension was raised to twenty dollars.
In 1903, she donated the farm to a church group on the condition that the home be maintained as a refuge for “aged and indigent colored people” and that she be allowed to live in the house for the rest of her life. In 1913, the woman known in the Union Army as “the General” died and was buried with military honors.

Last Reviewed: May 04, 2007 04:23 PM
—————————————————————————————————

Sorry
and
Good week

Benedito Ubirata

It was all I needed in the 80’s specifically in the 88th, when I traveled to Rio de Janeiro and strange facts gave me a good home. I won a beer truck overturned in an accident with no victims in the BR 116 highway, where I filled the car that I travel with about 100 cans of beer on the road to the state of Rio de Janeiro. When I arrived, I came across the avenue Brazil in a state of high violence, with people making barricades to steal the vehicles traveling at dawn.
I slept in a house that had a spirit that wanted to drink alcohol and satanic worship rituals, I woke up going to tour the south of Rio de Janeiro to see the new world I did not know. When I came across natives showing the crucial problems of the state.
I left there not knowing what happened. I had many questions that I thought of the state, the questions were internal and I could not answer scholarly. I replied only that the Rio de Janeiro had to change but had no theoretical insight, erudtia, Citati.
I saw many movies and appeared when the Rio de Janeiro felt I should not see them. Something was missing and the years have passed and still not understand what I needed. The two historical facts gave me the answer, too late but gave me the answer.
This article shows what I needed to answer those who wondered about the Rio de Janeiro Guanabara or old, former capital of Brazil that the natives in the 80s I had shown that large losses by having the transfer of capital to Brasilia , the current capital. But I needed the theoretical discourse, with what I needed to signal that I watched for a positive Americanization, but with no legal advice, social, psychosocial.
This text shows all in theoretical terms than needed that state. We can not align ourselves to the system. We in Brazil are still anti Semitic, racist to the very changes that happened in the United States of America in the 90’s already trying to create icons for if they had the weakest countries in a good example, and we one of the weakest countries resistiamos this change. In another article below, by its historical presentation, shows the attempt of the Bush Sr. trying to create a new icon to the North American system of government and the world. Try putting in the Supreme Court a conservative view of African descent and strongly supported by the giants of the United States of America who wanted to change your view of white supremacy, which invaded the world culture.
And they in turn leave that culture invading the world connected to them, would be to own North American, a great loss, especially after a victory in the Second World War against one of the worst moves that the history of mankind can have Nazism.
They could not let them be an icon of influence to many cultures in the world, had the origin of birth of the movement already defeated again in 1945, Nazism.
Bush has that sensitivity and tries to recreate the North American vision in the world have not only african only celebrity offspring that happened in that period of the decade 80 to 90 with actors such Academy of Hollywood, but based on politics, culture, the intellectuals and scholarship. They needed only the end of African descent as musicians, dancers or artists.
The appointment of an African descent Thomas aa North American Supreme Court was a modification of this view inside the country and the world.
What saddens me is that today I understand the negative and destructive criticism of Brazilian intellectuals and educated the new North American trend. It saddens me because it gives the direction of the new  in line political and social moment in Brazil.
Since 1989, Brazil entered a culture war and influence the way North American confuse everyone and everything so hard that a few here in my country survived because they saw that parents needed to align and change because these changes could be beneficial the parents. I was almost killing the Brazilian media highly racist and anti Semitic.
They leave no ethnically oppressed classes in the 40’s and 50 degree climb and position to be good examples to the same ethnic group that needed good examples and dominant ethnic groups who wanted to modify.
These two articles I fully explain what I needed to discuss in the midst of Humanities that I avoided attending for more than 10 years at the university I studied and got kicked out for being of African descent. They members of the Human Sciences University asked me to participate, but I had no feeling.
I saw, but had no basis. It is 20 years.

read the texts:

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 09:45 E

Two decades later, Clarence Thomas is still a (relatively) young justice

By Eleanor Clift

HAATEAMATQ/YouTube

Clarence Thomas and former president George H.W. Bush

Most Americans had never heard of Clarence Thomas when President George H.W. Bush nominated him for the Supreme Court 20 years ago this month. Bush, who announced his pick in Kennebunkport, Maine on July 1, 1991, called the thinly credentialed Thomas the “best qualified” person for the seat vacated by retiring Justice Thurgood Marshall, a giant of the law who had argued the landmark Brown v. Board of Education case and was the Court’s first African-American justice.
Thomas had only been a federal judge for a year when Bush tapped him for the Supreme Court, and the gap in stature compared to Marshall, the man he would replace, set the terms for the rancorous fight that followed. Democrats charged the White House with playing racial politics with an unqualified candidate on the assumption that they wouldn’t dare oppose an African-American.
The media covered Thomas as though Bush had plucked the 43-year-old from obscurity, but Washington’s legal community was not surprised by the nomination. “Everyone assumed when Thurgood Marshall resigned, the seat had to be filled by an African-American,” said Nan Aron, president of the progressive Alliance for Justice. “When Thomas went up for the DC Circuit, we knew it was a done deal. He was groomed for the seat.”
Republicans saw a political opening, thinking they could win over some voters with what Bush viewed as an historic appointment. Thomas’ race mattered, but he was chosen as much for his reliable conservative ideology as the color of his skin. The rallying cry then was “No More Souters,” recalled Aron, referring to Justice David Souter, who Bush had appointed to the Court the previous year, and whose voting record was looking very liberal and angering the GOP’s conservative base.

——————————————————————————————————————

Tuesday, Jul 5, 2011 07:01 ET

The three fundamentalisms of the American right

Good Week

Benedito Ubiratã

I lived to write this text. I studied in the 90’s with a famous professor of Structural Geology in the UK. Teacher Colsgrove it took to come to Brazil and taught us that class. The explanation of his coming to Brazil was given by my teacher the other Brazilian Sadovisk a Structural Geology Professor, I have always answered many questions outside the classroom. And the question was simple as Professor Colsgrove was in Brazil, where Brazilian teacher then said that because of the new trend of the former first minister Mrs. Thatcher’s Britain was cutting expenses of all kinds, they were running out of its colonies, and its economy needed to adapt. In this case the teacher was following the trend laboratories were Englishmen who seek resources for their research internationally. I laughed a little because he was seeking funds in Brazil, but I let it go. I did not understand very well how things worked back then. But what I realized is that fetch line of research was not what he was doing but rather resources to increase technical reserve your lab with agreements with the government visited. Professor Sadovski this case was the host of Brazil. If the economy improved English can be said that there are reflexes, but the strongest reflection is the literature of 1920 on the English nobility by the regionalist English writer W. Somerset Maugham in your novel The Razor’s Edge of the time over the bourgeoisie and the nobility and your expenses in that decade. And the nobility today as she lives, in this case controlling your spending so you do not encumber the coffers of the UK. If I mistake not even have a movie about Queen Elizabeth 2 clearly demonstrates that this new trend of the economy and spending cuts.

In this text of the New York Times, I believe that if the former mayor of New York Bloonberg the Lord is right in what he mentioned last year that the U.S. Congress their congressmen are not able to read, is now one year after they are reading the text is didactic as well as a bridge (analogy) the willingness of the Republican party to cut public spending in the country. The history of the Lady Margaret Thatcher as Prime Minister of the UK is very strong when it comes to cutting spending and reducing the tendency of a decadent society that squandered in public spending.

What is unclear is the adaptation that taxes should be high or low class for richer or poor. That is, when it comes to Margaret Thatcher is that she made no apology for taxes in his time, but the cuts in public spending. This claim is already becoming global. In Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel the current fight with your audience to review the condition of super tax on businesses or industries. All this as they fought to be able to contain the “industry to make taxes” to lessen the heavy awareness of actions not well accepted in society.

Read full text:

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/05/the-legend-of-margaret-thatcher/

July 5, 2011, 6:00 am

The Legend of Margaret Thatcher

Bruce Bartlett held senior policy roles in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations and served on the staffs of Representatives Jack Kemp and Ron Paul.

Former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher of Britain, here in 2008, is venerated by many conservative Republicans in the United States.

Republicans have always admired former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher of Britain. Her 1979 election excited them enormously; Republicans viewed it as proof that their views were on the upswing and greatly increased their confidence that Ronald Reagan would be elected president in 1980 as part of a worldwide conservative trend.
Mrs. Thatcher’s stature among the American right has only increased since she was ousted by her own party in 1990. This is especially true now. Benjy Sarlin of Talking Points Memo says Mrs. Thatcher “has always been a popular figure in Republican circles across the pond, but she seems to have taken on a new relevance in recent years for the party’s leading lights.”
Mr. Sarlin cites a blog post on Mitt Romney’s Web site that draws a parallel between economic conditions in Britain in the late 1970s and those in America today. He reports that Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum also invoke Thatcher’s name frequently in their quest for the Republican presidential nomination. And last month, Sarah Palin publicly requested a meeting with Thatcher that fell through because of Mrs. Thatcher’s physical condition.
While Mrs. Thatcher is a towering figure in British political history, well deserving of admiration, the conservative legend about her time in power is at odds with the facts. In this legend, she was even more aggressive than Reagan in cutting taxes and the welfare state. But that is not true.

As this table shows, taxes as a share of the gross domestic product in Britain actually increased sharply during Mrs. Thatcher’s first seven years in office before falling in the later years. Even at the end, they were significantly higher than they were when she took office. Spending also rose during her first seven years before falling in Mrs. Thatcher’s later years.

Institute for Fiscal Studies

To those familiar with Mrs. Thatcher’s tax policies, these data are not surprising. Although she cut the top personal income tax rate to 60 percent from 83 percent immediately upon taking office, the basic tax rate was only reduced to 30 percent from 33 percent. And in 1980, the 25 percent lower rate of taxation was eliminated so that 30 percent became the lowest tax rate.
More importantly, Mrs. Thatcher paid for her 1979 tax cut by nearly doubling the value-added tax to 15 percent, from 8 percent. Among those who thought Mrs. Thatcher was making a dreadful mistake was the American economist Arthur Laffer. Writing in The Wall Street Journal on Aug. 20, 1979, he excoriated her for taking with the one hand while giving with the other.
“The Thatcher budget lowers tax rates where they have little economic consequence and raises tax rates where they affect economic activity directly,” he complained.
In the 1982 forward to the British edition of his American best-seller, “Wealth and Poverty,” George Gilder was also highly critical of Mrs. Thatcher for failing to cut either taxes or spending: “The net effect of the Thatcher program has been a substantial increase in taxation on virtually all taxpayers.”
Although Mrs. Thatcher privatized many British industries and businesses that had been nationalized after World War II and sold off much of Britain’s public housing, in which the bulk of the working class lived, she did little to reduce the size of the nation’s welfare state.
In particular, Mrs. Thatcher, like all the members of her party, strongly supported the National Health Service, which provides national health insurance for every Briton.
A review of long-term spending trends in Britain by the Institute for Fiscal Studies shows that Mrs. Thatcher basically flattened a trajectory that had been rising since the war. That took a lot of political effort even though her party controlled Parliament and the prime minister of Britain has far fewer constitutional constraints than an American president. But at the end of the Thatcher era, the welfare state was still intact.
As Martin Wolf, a columnist for The Financial Times, told me, “Like all great politicians, Thatcher was a pragmatist, not an ideologue, who picked her fights carefully. She recognized that any head-on attack on the welfare state would have destroyed the party’s electability.”
Mr. Wolf said Mrs. Thatcher was far more concerned about fiscal stability and deficit reduction than lower taxes, and the idea that a debt default “would have been sensible would, to her, have been insane.”
Mrs. Thatcher, like Reagan, moved her country in a conservative direction. But Mrs. Thatcher’s fiscal accomplishments were much more modest than many of today’s Republicans think.
The lesson they should learn from her is that it is very hard to shrink the size of government even when a strong leader has complete control of the legislature, that it takes many years of arduous work to do so and that at the end of the day it won’t shrink very much.
If the first Russian president Dmitri Medmedev announced months ago that the world could return to the 80, leaving it as a calling. And then the Russian General Andrei Makarov announces the call back to the 80s. I believe the Republican Party is already in North American racing back to see if this saves big phase in your country. It is speculated that in Germany the call of Mr. Makarov was heard, as the youth movements have begun to move in the same way as young people moved in the 80’s. Making and using large public meetings to large festivals and concerts.
In terms of public administration I remember that internal debt and external debt, was all that was said too.——————————————————————————————

Good Week

Benedito Ubiratã