SoapBox
Benedito Ubirata Benedito Ubirata
An important interview

http://noticias.terra.es/2011/espana/1224/actualidad /el rey es tiempo de-to-them-haveentreguen tar threat-versus-weapons-yDesaparezcan.aspx-

El Rey “Es tiempo them that terrorist weapons entreguen y sus desaparezcan”

noticias.terra.es

El monarch ha hecho una special mention of them casualties del terrorism, that there appears to offer them su “Apoyo y Solidaridad affection” y ha points out that it firmly unidad de los Españoles y “han shown that totalitarian proyectos them fit in Tienen en la Espa

——————————————————————————-

After reading this interview my collaboration for those who want to study.

Some of the different calls of the years 2003 to 2004. One was that in order to be guaranteed with the new technology needed to keep the conversation between people reliably. Conversations should be made ​​through Internet videoconferencing.
We can still see us when we talk on the internet. We can observe.
For countries with cold winters this would be much needed. The cold prevents people are outside their homes.
Otherwise, we will never know with confidence who could be speaking. We only see the writing, if there is a problem of language is lost in the words that make us be confident. The facial expression is still recommended. We have this as something of childhood, when someone does not understand the resource use of facial expression, to see what people want to express themselves. In a strange language impairments if the image in video conference and expressed makes us confident in our analysis.
The Internet suffers a problem, the risk of being inhibited.
Brazil has high performance internet already have traces of it can be done. Achieved something I thought was impossible. I am concerned that certain phenomena show that countries cold as Canada and Russia may be going the same way by taking certain indices that show one way the internet.
And the output to a video conference is also having a good contact and away from your home in a clean and healthy. I lived with a good phase in 2002, with video conferencing. And as I tried to live it in 2009 and had a little use of videoconferencing in Brazil, now I suspect that we have no more.
The biggest problem is that I think the broadband Internet can end video conference because without the need of the band wide is over. But without video conferencing is no longer necessary. You can read texts well in bandwidth slower and cheaper. I believe that the deconstruction of the Internet has begun.
In mid-2009 some media on the Internet, social networks were making allegations that were being invaded by influences as diverse as Al Qaeda and other terrorist group.
The influence or recruitment can be a way for this event of decreased use of videoconferencing, but there are other traits that lead to other observations, which go to other areas. For example, because terrorist groups like social isolation. For me only the recruitment and grooming. The false morality.
Since then I started to observe some means of communication within the Internet cited as the most invaded by the groups mentioned.
If you noticed, picking up conversations between members of social networks, psychosocial behavior is mappable areas and temporally. One can observe the behavior of individual cases of the members, or cases grouped by different areas
Almost all suffer from the problem of deconstruction of the Internet. Do not use half of electronic tools that technology can offer. Do not use the webcams, do not use, the devices that make recording that contains in simple cell phones, none are exposed. Do not take pictures of himself, the amount should be infinite for each of them, after all in the 70 spending for film processing and photo millimeter home movies (Super Eight) was hundreds of times.
They do not write about of himself, they all write their thoughts but the thoughts of others.
Social networks do not do video conferences since 2003 when it begins to fade the use of some public program for videoconferencing. With the improvement of the translators of foreign languages ​​instead of increasing the contact that was great among people from other continents to each other, eventually diminishing. Besides the difficulty of social networks are intercontinental. Most are close to continents not allowing the User to have the opportunity to seek other people in other continents.
Social networks have increasing domination of excluding groups that will conduct an independent own members who do not fall. There is a visible point of exclusion, and a noticeable point of exclusion. The behavior seen is the long duration of 12 months, is the vision of conditioned behavior. If everyone has photos and their own families, everyone has. If you take all the pictures, take all. The percepcion temporary, taking the dates of changing characteristics of a profile of each notice a change in profile of many.
The language is strange and not open, the language is other than a period, and certainly much more contradictory because There is a great freedom and that freedom is not usable.
Today a home internet can reach 20,000 bps bps against 9.6 in 1994, and interativid and use of scientific opportunity, social and technological comes to be opposed to 1994. There are thousands of billions of data and information in 1998 four years after the 96 bps to 9.6 since it is much more variable util. In 1998 there was a User the ability to discover all its problems solved on the Internet. In 2004, the User feels the need to modify the course of your internet internet ultra continentals to see variability in the 2010 User hardly feel variability information. If he runs off to other continents is your information is set equal to that of his own continent. Thousands of billions of information begin to have a condition. The conditioning is no longer persecution mania is noticeable. Quantified is considered the opposite of a persecution in 1994.
internet for official calls were many, for example, the excessive use of figures and colors in 1998. Yahoo and Oracle have joined calls for making their sites almost monochrome for easy navigation and it may contain information quickly.
In 2011 the rate is nearly 2000 times and the use of multimedia resources have not yet returned. 12 years and adherence to conditioning color is noticeable. There is no more justification for the withdrawal of technological and polychromatic images.
Prior to 1998 was a recursive problem of low capacity transmission speed and processing power. Today, the processors in the same dichotomy of technology hardware (AMD x INTEL) is nearly 10 times more potent (calculated linearly) to observe exponentially if the values ​​are much higher increase in processing capacity. This is almost monochromatic respectable, but today is unacceptable.
The low capacity of available documentation on government websites is percepcion from country to country. You can search from “wanted” on the official websites for research in many countries, but you can also access the documentation on the basis of scientific research in an organized manner. Already some government websites do not reflect anything more than just the institutional marketing of a central figure. Sometimes an object or a person who directs.
The existence of just reading figures is classifiable by the quality of people psychologically. Written language is excluded by the psychological capacity of each User. Some express themselves about themselves and the world. Others are attached to only provide meta, or get stuck metalanguage disrupted by reading any one of the instrument that an image can have. That is, the User does not put the title, nor explanation, and requires that other users understand their messages.
In psychiatry the term referential considerations is noticeable in the profiles noting that people may talk about yourself in the comments people can reflect, discuss and not utils these facilities. In itself of course they may not want to expose, but it is noticeable that they charge so-called “requests”. Or is that someone should have understood what they wanted to express themselves. Traces of a referential considerations, but a deficiency in technology the use of technology. A User can set the size of your penis, shoot it, shoot it, put the disease, and then ask who wants to have, relationships, your health and have correct yes, results. A woman could put her breasts, her vagina, and penis to ask who has it in size she wanted, that is to hurt or feel full, you could request review of the disease, or whether she has beauty or not. However, all reveal loneliness. Everyone is waiting.
I call it deconstruction of electronic technology just because there will come a moment and lowers the prices to ridiculous values ​​or else people will get off because according to the habits acquired will no longer need so much processing power. Perceive the illusion.
Once it is realized that nothing is being lost utils also the need for new technology purchases in processing capacity. That way there will be a break of related products. They need to be developed for the Internet. If you are going to use the internet less developed areas of computer graphics such is meaningless. Graphics are not required, capable processors will not be necessary. It uses a simple linux 1997 and has the results. A loss of technological advancement.
There’s just the areas of Electronic Engineering, Economics and Macro Economic and Commercial Medicine and give their DALYs.
Trend statistical analysis is more a crisis in the future. The graphics are not being true in the analysis.

Good week

Benedito Ubiratã

Note: Happy holidays.

Benedito Ubirata Benedito Ubirata

No comments.

I started down this path.

Local Power and Electrical Engineering Institute of USP.


After

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

A project. Case study.

Back home from praiseworthy. Without prejudice. Nor is saint … My old, my mother Dona Maria Helena de Carvalho . My last place of studies over the past 19 months.


Another new line of research and formalization of my editorial. I sent up a letter to the Faculty of Law, University of Sao Paulo. For those who do not know … The old tradition of respecting the secretaries of department and office. Now, thanks to international law.

But the editorial line of the blog. Again, a new line of research.


There is direct mail.


Provenance. Review.

Remember old was called. And I heard it was called. “Provenance”!!!

University of St. Andrews, United Kingdom.


Many thanks to the FBI and the Department of Justice North America. I provided many documents that helped me formulate my hypotheses.

One of these institutions by citing my blog because the same U.S. watched events with Members of U.S. Congress.


But back to old and ancient line of research.


COPESP

Coordinator of Special Projects

Ministry of the Brazilian Navy.

And finally the two bases for those who want to follow the path “still free.”

and the surprise is that there’s no escape

goes from the Geological Sciences Mathematical Sciences Military Science to Science of Criminal Investigation

Vectors

And the only pair of Sciences praised in my short walks around Sao Paulo

Physical Sciences

and

Historical Sciences

in my case

http://www.history.army.mil/

With files from the Department of Military History of the United States of America I was able to produce a work that I’m jealous of myself, the Korean War.

I managed to tie watching nearly every topic of this post.

History of the USArmy But I can produce something that the link below to read in Spanish, is a bit of geological and sedimentological observations, hydrological, and oceanographic. The subject is interesting and shows the suffering and expectation of the Chinese people, and South Korea in the Yellow Sea.

————————————————– ——————————

La guerra en Corea del Norte, which puede be light?

http://comunidad.terra.es/blogs/benebira/archive/2010/03/30/lague

————————————————– ——————————

Because of this post I got to get the Brazilian Navy.

Just noting that we have an excellent Brazilian nuclear project while only under supervision of the Brazilian Navy .

I compared with satellite images, geological maps, documents and photos and the Museum of the American Army North Korea as it was in 1950.

And the suffering of the life expectancy of China (Shanghai) and South Korea all live on rice and fish in the Yellow Sea a sea of ​​icy water.

Hugs and good week

Benedito Ubirata da Silva

Benedito Ubirata Benedito Ubirata

For those who want to do is rest and reading, so if you read something that gives to rest.
The site I read years ago.
http://torrentforce.blogspot.com/
But it does not seem to have passed 5 years University of São Paulo, from when I started watching these movies. In addition to reading many newsletters, so many international reports, I’ve got him home to live abroad, have received up projects that I collaborate abroad. Time passes and only increases the problem. Let him who sits only gives room for disappointment may not be able to correct those happening in the trend. Those who do not have good example can not achieve the emotional young. It was a hard period of 3000  readings, writing from reading news, newspapers and magazines. Both scientific as Nature, Science and other areas of political and military. The lever to push young people and children is not only the imagination and keep you emotionally. Must have level of success. I learned with you. there are people being used to recruit and enlist in the degree of non-success. Only when they want to see which way the report were recruited and enticed.
Here you have an address of a blog that has reviews for many films, it is good to rest and learn to make reading of films.
As for which films in the 90s I’d say in 93. Turns in the thirty. I was 30.
But for movies, statements of the literature, even some suggestions of films I always talk to people. I was always finding myself with them. Or was it in the clubs of staff who always had a video library, or in some other points that we were dating. With this only on my common sense, to choose directions, suggestions, and advice, it is good to improve our minds and always re-evaluate our ability social.E in whom we walk and we follow the suggestions.
Council of my old psychologist, when I did a brief therapy (I was to experience, had come out about this new type of therapy in the Journal of USP and I was curious, do not know if I liked, only, Brief Therapy, or Psychology [beautiful ? hot? let's be polite])
Anyway the advice was: What would be better if I lower my sensible. (2001)
In fact it was interesting because it was just an excellent review of what I had learned in 85, by a nun. For example the false jealousy was one of the things we do not have the teaching given by a holy person, nothing works, the persistence in the air it becomes continuous, the decentralization invariably happens.
Another lesson is that this time traveling south of Brazil by the way I can make friends, and with so many people talking and exposing his thoughts, could not retain my old instructions. Emotions make our instructions are lost. And my instructions were too important to be forgotten. It was a good review of the psychologist.
To get an idea of ​​the old instructions that Brazil is the South, should not happen. There is only one Brazil.
I was small when I went for the exams of the School of Cadets of the Air Force in Barbican. Receive the disapproval was painful.
There was nobody in the neighborhood that was running. At school I only had silly by that symbol. The Yellow Wing.
I’ll never forget when he came to fail, I remember this time I was upset, I just threw away the wood pyrography I drew on the wing of the Brazilian Air Force yellow after a few years.
Almost all of my kits from Revell Aircraft of World War II that my aunt and my father gave me everything I sent into space.
It was 1976. I had my collection of kits from Revell that my great-aunt gave me every time she had money left from his hair salon. Mogi Mirim and we walked when we walked in the toy store, always had a plane to ride in small models. The smaller scales I did not like. (The planes that are large in scale at the end of almost half a meter)
After the failure could only finish the gym and go to Collegiate. And constantly receive instruction. I was very, I acquired the habit of never having a single group of friends. I acquired the habit of never telling a single class one truth about me.
If he saw a movie, sometimes with a commented. If you read a book sometimes talking to others. It was the last pre-separation. What a funny always used the concepts of Freudian psychology. That is, I always thought it was normal stages of adolescence. As the facts would grow a normal teenage girl going on, the separation of groups of friends would happen: Friends who are married, people who get a girlfriend, after friends who have children and so on. Until the death of all. Each separation was posing as normal.
And then came the last statement of separation and a nun, we can not have love as a fixed thought. The lack of sensitivity, rather than the cold is required to be a good memory to have good observation.
And that made me fail impregnated with an issue that psychometric test 1976. Never let it be. Even after I entered the USP. And it could never be more than what even seeing so many people dying.
We try to do anything beyond that point. But it never works. The statement in question will no longer break up the time that the statement of the issue begins and ends. After that only suffers. There are almost 34 years. And do not fail. Every time I went to a distant point, see, observe, report, from the moment they passed it, I just hurt me.
The question directs, do beyond what is breaking the rules.
You can not do the work of an entire army. Otherwise you focus, you become a star.
The batter just watches and alerts. The rest is who does the Army. For this one returns to its point of report and report what they saw. The question seemed easy, but had five alternatives.
And one of them is stupidity for those who responded. I remember like it was today, it was as if I heard after I had responded, the others were responding.
I do not know whether to laugh or if he got nervous.
Almost everyone around me that would be answered after arriving at the venue and took the weapon and used against the enemy.
Stupid I told myself at the time. And the army will know how?
For the use of Scout? I laughed the other.
And while so many people kept looking at Morumbi Stadium doing the same test.
But that question was silence, and the number 2 pencil would not let me do the erasure. It marked the first choice if I used the eraser.
No one gets to use their weapons and attack the enemy, have to report back to the visa. It was easy.
I watched as much film of the second world war in black and white, with those directors who are the good war movies (in my opinion, I think, because the movies were good war movies where the actors actually their uniforms soiled in the mud and injuries). What the watching scouts with them the stories, there were plenty to answer the question.
Note: to my relief was reminded of films after the question answered. After only has to listen to what others were responding after I answered, and I remember how nervous I was and went to check what I had answered. Then came the silence of so many people doing the test. We could not even lift his head. It was a military test. And I had answered differently. It was easy. I did not want to understand why the answer so stupid. Perhaps because he had to be, do not understand why they did not do the obvious. As logical.
Finally he was 13, my capacity only, not to forget what went right and follow another path. I left the idea of ​​the School of Cadets of the Air Force. My father insisted again, did other military tests just to make him happy. Maybe it was the influence of the time that the left was very aggressive and wanted at all costs to make more control to your style. And apparently it did not work. He did not, but talked a great deal left, critivamos hours straight left that have not accepted him. Unions were objectionable in terms of our descent Brazilian Economy in the wood bars where we met, made us glad that years later, all were broken. They left their base and went their separate ways began to stop being pawns of the season left. Unionism and politics is a dangerous thing. If you are not critical and control nothing works.
Do not depend on me.
But that was the proof, 1976. That was what influenced me, gave me instruction. The others only remember the instructions from my father before the tests. The rest I do not see the results. I felt that this would not be my way, I was beginning to build the libraries that I would follow. Now would go back and redo something that did not work. Aspirant difference is Cadet.
With the instruction of Nun, was able to keep in mind, all I needed.
If I hold the other instructions, especially those just entering the emotional side, I certainly would have ceased to be Christian. Amazingly, a Christian education of Christians who have always been taught to love as something important. For me this was. Served? My intent has always been to protect those who protected me, Christians. I think it served.
Why? I had to walk in places that I had to walk and emotions would not be able to continue. How to continue without having stomach?
In these 34 years I saw many people condemning everything received by sacred love. Throwing it all away, that is the enemy, or to futile (if the enemy is behind the acts is also futile to a specialized group, then distributes the observation).
“What would you do if a batter was called by the official to see the front of enemy territory. And find the enemy”
Without proper coldness in the things I saw, if I had not this lack of sensitivity, and the constant worry of being original. I could not see what I wanted and needed.
The world was changing so much I could not see, and I even consider today a very favorable thing for me. I had to be kept naive lot. That to me is very favorable. For I am free of such perversion.
I discuss that today I smile, I’m happy. I’m always smiling. I did not attend these things to be unconscious, naive, induced ignorance.
If I need to audit something, sure to be a lot easier. It has always been much easier. I see with the sight of an ancient world.
I notice the books that I had to read. With classroom instruction in person. With personal observations and conversations with people from all walks of life that allowed me to Society. If today she ask about classes higher or lower I have this vision. I can conflict with everything I see left.
A batter, if you had it and made it back alive. Assuming that one day I went to scout, taking into account a lot of obstacles I had to go alone as a good hitter. It also may give many good reports.
There are times when it is best to do alone. A long time I’ve settled so much better, is much easier then. It’s a lot more happiness.
And have the guarantee that if these errors are errors and yours alone. For those who analyzes the results is easy to evaluate the limits of who was watching.
There are times that I had with someone would be much better. It would have to share the vision. Note from different angles of vision. Bases of different careers. It would be much proveitoso.Já happened. The Brazilian is repeated many times to separate people conforntar observations. This is so repetitive and wrong that results is just what you see. It took more than 30 years of Brazil and the world has worsened.
Marketing changes the institutional vision, influence, but does not report is not a source of information is influence. They have the responsibility of influence, but not reported. If you are sure to report reporting to the client. There is no ethics. There is a deviation of only racicínio Customer Portfolio Contractor Marketing.
But often the worst rule is to behave according to what a company boss.
Easy, is that once you can criticize. She becomes responsible for the order, or the responsibility to let you in these conditions.
But over time if you are asked to do more work in the same way, you can not refuse. How did you learn to do alone, learned to see the limits of observation. Learned to see that you can not see farther because there is a need for additional viewing angles.
At that time, the naivety and trust that the Company will not betray you. Observe scientific phenomena can not be made so to see how anyone would. That someone may just want someone to fall with his remark. A note is vitiated only leads to a vicious remark, but if you get to do it you can do it and not be condemned. But there is no guarantee of the enemy does not like. There must be protection. Otherwise, the first thing you will do in the enemy army that is destroying all the scouts. At least that these observations do not scouts aflinjam the enemy. What scouts are these? What should be subordinate to the order of observation to his army, and then will have to give reports that favor the enemy army? For this is not batter. In fact it will tell the Army that no enemy scouts the other army, able to invade a surprise. So the element of surprise that a batter can offer, or if you just defend.
At any time a batter will be very well protected. The society that condemns and unprotected exposure to condemn it or lose it then makes a report and get addicted, totally dangerous for you. For this report only favor the enemy. Suffer the element of surprise.
After the experiences you decline or accept. Conversation with the Company and should not be said to be done in solitude. Will be able to talk if there is a possibility and perhaps the end results will be desaproveitáveis. Or the worst is not at risk of not returning. After all you need for a striker, if it does not return? Requests to make an assessment of how many scouts were left.
Refuses to realize that the need the need to put more eyes, or separately or together.
So I always had a sort that has always considered this as a phase of batter. If it does not come very easy. There will be further incursions.
I was raised well. I have created to be so young. If you have not been spoiled by my will.
I lived it, I read almost every magazine Brazilian Air Force officers, Sindacta, ESA and so much information that at the end when it came to failure. There was only education, and more education, always based on the dark foray forward. And a light weight. Almost everything I wanted in lucky I was. Until a certain time. After my achievements are just what I have learned and did not have recourse to gain by teaching. I can read.
And the worst was given instruction in the classroom, on the streets with persistent meetings. There is only one Brazil South Brazil. Why the worst? As I saw people wanting the separation. It was one of the worst comments. Because along with it comes seduction, money, women, religion, politics, has much that you keep your cool, will keep in mind you need. And life will follow.
86 And then I got a late stage very strange and coincidental. I was six months alone in a seminary for priests in Campinas off after what is now the CPFL (CESP was then, and at the time the director was Professor José Goldemberg. Remember that seminars had two priests, one was disabled and one was active (I loved going to the asset to eat the lunches they sell, and use the library of the fathers. It was a gift to me, live in Taquaral 6 months alone gave me to redo my mind (ideas, build my future, review goals, learn about new trends). Coincidentally, if I remember correctly, the seminar, sold the property to the former governor of São Paulo, which belongs to the PMDB, and former mayor of Campinas. The world is small, my late uncle was Walfredo construction contractor who sold the house to him. The owner of the building and my uncle were childhood friends. A new phase, and went back to study at USP 3 years later.
I had to follow the right path of my creation, which was not to be sensitive and be original. The coldness is necessary when we have to follow certain paths. It was a nun who taught me, my creation has always been Christian. If they do not live the next 40 years the Monastery Santa Terezinha, I recommend a nice place rides from time to time … Please. Carmelite nuns are, they can not get out of their cloistered life. Can not walk to see the world. The world has to go see them.
If you live to hear just the way it is dirty and rotten as the air they will suffer much more per year every day.
And I remember the newspapers of the 80 shows that there are people interested so they suffer. Just see who committed the attack on the old pope.
The world is not what it was in my time of adolescence and they are always collected, as are many today. It’s no good to just go “next”, “ladinho of” places to get inspiration.
Japanese Buddhists have a great lesson: You have to give to receive. If you have got to give.
Also for those who can not have a Japanese Buddhist monastery close to my home and childhood. Right next to my old gym.
You can not live scrapbook. Comments only supports the industry and the lack of intrigue. My messages have been made in writing, with my name, and no code, and always assumed I took what I wrote.
From what I’ve learned you can not give to others what we do not write and sign. It was something I learned in school. I gave papers at the time of São Paulo, and were read repeatedly for years.
Wrote summaries, reviews, and after the lesson the teacher in the classroom. A good newspaper and a good story is made and signed by the journalist. We lived military dictatorship of the period prescribed the president was the late Mr. General Ernesto Geisel. We saw many people complaining about him, but all of us small boys, girls, lived purity, lightness. We could play, we could study. But to recognize only those who signed their observations.
Because the teaching he said, he was hard line. But who signed were brave. He was much more than the hard-line military dictatorship. He had the hard-line critics who were also readers. After all, if you do not like, do not buy, the run was lost. He had no sponsor and had no profits. Capitalism was the ideological our practice, we protected in this.
Who knew who wrote had to know who to blame or give credit. The hard line was not only the late Army General, former Lieutenant General, an evangelical, of German descent, who was not a Nazi as saying. I am of African descent. I had an excellent education curriculum based on what he left us at that time. So like do not like African descent. And the most beautiful are different.
We can be criticized. But we have the basic formal education and in person. Their demand. This is our story. The absence of Mystification.
The absence of the misuse of imagination.
Imagine not intuit. And in mathematics from the university here, I also learned in the classroom in person: Intuit is not wrong. But imagine bounds. induce the imagination I can only say what I have always taught. Generates unreality with ulterior motives.
The term is mine: “Misuse of Reasoning.” If it is not induced or another department, is another observation group. But it is diversion of reasoning.
So something I learned as a recess at the time, it is time to study and rest.
Try to see movies, go back to the ingenuity of silence to the ears of you will. Sometimes not knowing what happens around is much more interesting. When it comes to selection of you, that will count points. Be original.
In Japan people have to select children for their originality factor.
Paste to get a diploma … I know in my works of note … I can only say: They do theater all the time about to become paranoid, just watch. They can not be transparent.
The suspresa! Find out what they do outside the theater, just make me the happiest guy in the universe.
Some people due to sensitivity to the taste of the bread you consume. Imagine the rest. I can not see me asking for permission to go to steak house on Avenida Ipiranga. I can not see me asking for permission to go to Santa Iphigenia bungigangas buy my computer. Are those of the latter kind, or used with the origin and guarantee. I wonder asking permission to go buy meat in another “ladinho.”
The sensitivity for those who need to have is interesting for those who can not is also interesting. But that does not exist Sensitivity denies those who are special, sacred can not escape the idea of ​​paste, have the title, and then … The loss of certain sensible.
The other day I talked to a woman my age. Perfectly normal physically, socially completely normal. Two children.
However. Never had an orgasm. My age: 48 years.
Or a woman who does not sleep at 5 years. Or another woman who lives to see what others see. Or even a titled man, unflavored French bread. Or the worst one woman of 55 years, with the face of a woman 20 years old for 15 minutes, taking two blocks at risk of people without power. My mother has its worthy title, have diabetes, fills me with the patience to eat chocolate ice cream, fills me with the patience to eat too much brown. Why does it have the title and has all the senses?
Learn.
Crime does not pay.
Got a lot, so they do not let me be criminal. I took almost losing his life. I failed many times. But the teaching elder of the planet still exists.
Crime does not pay.
As my aunt said when I was a kid Lourdes:
Between the right and the Doubtful, prefer the right.
Crime does not pay.
Receiving the title of the crime, only that I noticed the enslaved. Track observe the reflections of what they do.
Prefer to naivety.
The Honor is to challenge everything for his mother.
It may even be Prime Minister of any country, can be Minister of Defense of any country, can be General, if the honor is his mother, challenge.
I saw what happened to those who gave. Can not complain, this is the worst. And most of the worst have to eat the tasty barbecue, do not feel anything tasty and pretend that it is very tasty. On that day I laughed when I commented on the air and alone. I’m eating persimmon and is juicy.
I walked by the side of the neighborhood of Santa Cecilia. I had great fun and I was very thankful for letting my girls like to ask all their short very short. I check this by passing well to the side and all very thin and all talking to people on the street, and “personally”.
It only makes me the happiest.
The older ones were made not only to disapprove, approve, or to pain. They were meant to protect. They were also made to relieve pain. If you stay in the naivety of course it will happen. Not that older people are foreigners.
Why foreign? What university did not seek an international assessment, or a major international award.
http://torrentforce.blogspot.com/
Good recess.
Benedito Ubiratã
Some districts and half later I thank the late Vice President Jose Alencar. His project was granted, and it worked. I just hope that they now show sequence. Call “method José de Alencar.”
That the Christian God, has it. As I fought with the old. He read lots and lots of my aggressive criticism. But do not let him down. The genocide did not happen in Rio de Janeiro when he was Minister of Defense. Today I understand, they were victims.
For those who do not know and he suffered greatly. I followed his stay in Sao Paulo every time I come here to make cuts and more cuts because of their cancer. Me and my old Santana smoky and almost always out of gas in the middle of traffic near the airport.
And never forget the day of his burial, and the smile of inadmissible that were present at the wake.

Benedito Ubirata Benedito Ubirata

The call in the 70’s in the end, I worked in company Italian multinational, was a pharmaceutical company, I was teen and worked 15 years in the department of data processing with a computer called Honewell Bull, I started to learn computing. I studied in high school, and my head was boiling in information. everything was bland was always in contact with new calls, translated and passed very well personally. they came ready and succinct little time he had a chance to talk some more. Then I went to mue group of friends (which unfortunately I had a good default, had several throughout the city) and discuss exactly these issues with them. One of the calls that concerned me most and has evolved until I choose not to psychology, was Burnout. Where I was at the Italian company was employee feedback about burnout. They just said about people who had sick leave for burnout. I was always careful about that. My recommendation is that I created was to travel. (If I’ve learned or created in the dark silence I do not know) But when I felt I was traveling near the burnout. Years later I read an immune to it. So within the friendship group of people came to the new call that was the Depression. I told myself immune, so I started hitting me with it stage by stage. Until I learned that depression is not fatigue. Needed to learn about how to become immune to depression. I always read books with authors who wrote and described the East Asia, the Buddhists. I decided to become a Buddhist, because I did not want to be a psychologist just to understand me, I decided that Buddhism had what I needed. Meditation. When he was in a meditation better than the doctors with their medicine. I left my upset because there was no prevention. I said in burnout because traveling is immune prevention. But for depression there is no prevention. Today I would say that I discovered another prevention. Physicians for a Depression Stress prevention, a call shortly after the call of Burnout. I laughed. I induced in my mind that if you do not swindles not make it to stress. It took me a long time with depression within the environment in the 90s. Conflict with a new technology that influenced the mind, depression led me to experience stress. In the new call schizophrenia, I did well. Because in 2002 I decided to take matter to me degree in education, and the need to do college work, the library, I just read an article. Explaining that the epilepsy report was based on depression. I could not get schizophrenia. Because even in the environment, or anyone if I stay away from stress, environmental schizophrenia could not reach. But the so-called schizophrenia environment I wanted to learn, not prcisou walk the corridors of the hospice or the offices of psychologists that whenever I showed up they told me to go since the 90’s by saying that I had no problems whatsoever. I was insistent and I think that each phase was about 4 different psychologists as well as always being close to the Institute of Psychology. But the environment has been called schizophrenia persist. And I began to conflict because I could not talk about young people’s time as build built for me calls. The conflict grew until teaching in 2007, the problems have improved. The conflict has decreased and the need to see psychiatrists and psychologists over. Schizophrenia environmental was have an answer for me. Within a Scientific American article. Or article caught my attention because I do not have a theme to give my students to build an interdisciplinary character with writing since I was a substitute teacher of organic chemistry of them. I needed a text interdisciplinary organic chemistry and biology. And text appeared in Scientific American that was the real gift. The identification with the text came to me regardless of class, because it was hot topic with a friend from university who had his work theme RNA. We talked about her work in the blood of patients with pulmonary infections at a university near my house. She was the university I studied and used the collected but the university laboratories close to my house. And the magazine article was very easy to understand. I remembered the issues and answer my questions. What came first the DNA or RNA. And throughout the article described the problem of keeping the code described in RNA to its end for the construction. The students had their work theme that helped him understand organic chemistry and the problem of human reproduction in biology. They just need to read and do a review, the rest we would discuss the measure we were having classes in organic chemistry. For me it was important they see the complex of RNA and DNA but they never would for example the importance of learning the format description of amines and amides. Has any base. But the peace of mind and emotional and spiritual, came when I saw the article I responded on the environment as a conceptual schizophrenia. Without you think about nuclear disaster. That is, if the DNA building the environmental code of schizophrenia had contact RNA to bring the code to nominate its construction of the road suffered a single disorder could make the protein Schizophrenia. At the time a nuclear disaster would be enough to generate a confusion in the construction of RNA and protein to the cell. The RNA would come disorganized abnormal protein, the cell would be the modification of human behavior. she would now be a cell with genetic traits of schizophrenia. The cancer has this problem. Schizophrenia could trace this path. But the years passed and completed nuclear disasters was still very strong and very weak. Because a disaster could not only make the mismatch of the set of atoms RNA molecule, as if it were too strong could do the destruction. Would that be something less than the destructive and strong enough to make small modifications. The disruption of RNA molecules is as difficult as breaking fat into energy, proteins are large but disorganized one atom is enough to change their characteristics and outcome. But one characteristic that is modified small changes can lead to the end of the cell body and its function and then behavior. The article below, shows another connection and continuity to me that I read the article SBPC (Brazilian society research and science – Magazine “Ciencia Hoje”), which was written in the 90s. Depression that had a link with epilepsy. But he also shows this link with epilepsy and schizophrenia. Then I’d say a slight environmental influences on the line of the genetic code of DNA to RNA to protein to produce schizophrenia or depression. If we made a graph, could put the protein in the center of epilepsy in the human body if there was a basis for this code. And then a single malfunction in the production code on Schizophrenia and Depression and the other around the epilepsy report. Depending on the influences could give the diversion of construction genetic depression or epilepsy. We have today in my mind many environmental influences that are not only the nuclear disaster for changes. Something like a disaster or environmental imbalance chemistry, biochemistry could cause the code to the environmental influences that RNA carries. Consider the text of Scientific American, he denounces the question about which came first the DNA or RNA? if we see that the possibility of exchange of one or the other on the idea which came first, then we can infer that DNA is the base to the RNA, the RNA could be the basis for future DNA. The DNA in the body is not eternal. When it was built or replace the ancient DNA, even if it was tough making the old code, if their RNAs were deconstructed in the way of an influence before arriving at the Ribosome to build protein. An hour of this construction would work for the modified DNA sequence of modified RNAs. Consider the replacement of the old DNA is modified by the risk of not having a reliable basis to ensure that RNA had the primary code of DNA. In other words, DNA makes RNA and has the consciousness that his successors will do the inserted RNA. RNA that comes through the next DNA. If a sequence of RNA to produce different proteins than RNA wanted to have the time to do a DNA DNA without the guarantee of RNAs that would prime DNA. If the DNA produces an RNA loaded code that produce proteins that lead to epilepsy. If a modifier sequence that occurs is small, epilepsy is no longer epilepsy. Is it something that can be linked around. Everyone around has its primary design. Chemistry would be an observation of the heroine  -  Morfine, of the amino acid  – AMINA. A single change in the whole of Amina transforms into another type of amino acids. Returning once again changed the code of the RNAs produce epilepsy report their resulting proteins, but when the DNAs were produced to be replaced they would not have a basis. Their RNAs produced cells that produced so different DNAs. A stage in the evolution. A mutation. Paleontology that would be easier to observe. For the historical period I have small complex bodies. A genetic disorder in these small bodies produce new modified bodies. When they reproduce bodies produce modified with modified DNA. But it would be a modification corpuscular. Playback. In paleontology would be ideal because they are small bodies and in world history I tenhoa bulk catastrophic events that could show a decline in the production of RNAs. For example, a DNA producing their RNAs usually take an ice age in the beginning, or a meteor fall near each other, heavily laden with radiation. That would make an influence on DNA and its construction of RNAs. The base has been lost over the modification would not be as Darwin demonstrates corpuscular evolving. But paleontologists but genetics, evolution corpuscular something less. If we had a specimen with epilepsy in the DNA code, and this has environmental action of the fall of a radioactive meteor near the body. This would change the design of the RNA. Or a change in the code designed by the RNA and DNA in a change of the code at the time of RNAs and protein production of a differentiation of the protein before. Events as may exist paleontology. Help to understand? For example, described the Russian idea of ​​modeling the growth of direct sunlight. It is followed by explosions and electromagnetic anomalies, these explosions suceed  the interference in the Earth system. The anomaly is an example of electromagnetic solar anomaly. But there are anomalies in the rate of cosmic rays, gamma rays more. All influence in terrestrial systems. From the artificial to the natural. If we take the anomalous event dysfunction last year’s big sunspot is modified with a large solar flare. Obvious influences that sparked a flame in the atmosphere for example. Or the geomagnetic Earth system, or electronic systems. All influence our system corpuscular We can, living a moment paleontology. We would have to relive the database for children born in 2010. Not to mention the future of these Darwinian to mate in the future and create new human would have to see if a genetic level from 2009 to 2010 there was a slight non-genetically modified. A modification that would generate a replacement based on the future of DNA in your body. For the two levels of paleontology would have drawn in the future, a genetic body and another for playback. In 20 years all the combinations would play a very small change in the future geologic time, but great for older models of scientific understanding. Why? Data are needed. Now we produce the database in blood (Mitochondrial DNA) by the millions. But a paleontological expedition would have no more than a thousand global view if we had a good conversation between scientists around the world based on stratigraphic good time. Would have to get a reliable period, that this gives enough samples and worldwide have these stratigraphic ranges. And then the collection would be done. And would you describe the vision and genetics to the study of catastrophic event similar to the present. The analysis would be parallel. The text below is instructive. Deserves due attention.

Good Week
Benedito Ubirata
Benedito Ubirata Benedito Ubirata

Darwin’s Dangerous Idea : Born Equal (BBC)

Video in link below:


http://www.youtube.com/v/KdrpgcMaPB4

Good Week

Benedito Ubirata

Benedito Ubirata Benedito Ubirata

This article explains a little call for concern with the issue reversal of moral values ​​to the older. The year the values ​​that had called the elders in a society, lost to the devaluation, and concern only and exclusively monetary and economic policy. Killing and despise their elders would be perhaps the revolution and not evolution darwin darwian. For Darwin the older animals would be if they were human contempt because they were weaker. And Darwin in evolution are always the weak and defeated by the community of animals discarded by the stronger. This could give way to a genetic view that only relies on combinations of biochemical evolution over time. But genetics also adds the knowledge acquired by previous animal. That is, if the acquired knowledge and previous animal survives even being more fragile, their offspring will add knowledge through genetics. Noting that the common animal. Now if you look at the human animal, that being older can not be dismissed as nowadays they are being disregarded.
Perhaps the article demonstrates this. He has only one premise, the observation paleontology. But you can look at other premises of the contamination present, the past 30 years of human will want to Darwinism but not in the conceptual opposition creationist versus evolutionist like watching and perhaps allowed themselves to divert attention, because it seems like just a trap of media to a prevailing social and economic plan does not take responsibility for class of human that only older can receive their pensions, creating a symbolic battle between religious and scientists so imbecile as diverting attention to the political level to consolidate. In the single fact worked a lifetime to sustain and keep the children alive. And acquired knowledge and at this stage can still collaborate with their ability to assimilate knowledge. This might explain why in the days when the plans started strongly in the system from 1986 to 1987 after taking some introductory books on philosophy in the old law office of my cousin in Mogi Mirim, a small town in Brazil. Some topics such as hypocrisy, demagoguery, existentialism, innateness, Socrates, Aristotle, philosophical thought versus scientific thinking, what most upset him was the empirical, or experience, writing briefly.
Other topics were placed, as phenomenology, and experimentalism that I reviewed almost all the university with observation of the physical sciences that a lot of practice the experimental, something that does not like to think  but in the 90’s they were discussing something that worked very well. But what most marked the 80 in this discussion was empiricism. I was naive, I was more concerned with getting ready for the university to realize the influence that began to mark with concern to the elderly.
I was able to talk even in the 80’s that I liked to live with their elders, and had no problems with them, a trademark was brought from my childhood.
But did not realize the call of concern and selection of those who do not always leave out the older (and not even realize that I practiced the protection of older and had been selected).
After this concern with the elderly would be easier in college I could not stay away from them (the gerontocracy), my questions were too heavy and caused non-existent projects, was called a pioneer in the corners of the university in all I move, and Obviously the older ones always gave me the base. Over time, I could not see what happened in contrast to my childhood and adolescence, which was the loss of human sensitivity to the elderly in the society outside the university, my time in it were consumed by almost every year, I lived in it all day and sometimes at night and dawn (extended periods within the Electronic Computing Center, then inside the laboratories of geology (mineralogy and hydrogeology miscroscopia) and then the phase is more modest than in the experimental phase field in lakes and rivers with hydrology and engineering geology, with the rest of sampling within my practice area dedicated to the sport. It was a convenient marriage between leisure, sport, science and education, and experimentation at this stage I am completely removed from society, almost ten years.
The cries about it long and Gerontology were everywhere, generated internal conflicts, until I came across institutionally with the need for destruction of the institution that there was an elder. The so called gerontrocacia older class that could collaborate with the young in experience was beginning to grow again and making me to new conflicts.
As in the early 90’s these speeches I made against my internal conflicts to my observations were only considered as acts of malicious and ulterior motives to protect me from what I considered persecution.
I took a silence, submission accepted the idea that I was under the persecution mania and I went back to strengthen and rebuild me. At that time I not only realized the devastating force of a growing company in the way of thinking in all places and media, and as I began criticizing in order to feel less fragile, I was criticized by many people that I used this speech as be an excuse to hide that I was not. It was a clever way to marginalize those who perceived negative psychological social waves everywhere, my base was perception of human behavior. I lived with many foreigners to the country, I talked to almost all social classes. I taught computer graphics in a rich neighborhood in the state capital where he lived, I lived and studied abroad, I rode the bus and went to the bars of the simplest classes and poor, and traveled widely to the rural economy (the lucky or unlucky I studied the course, geology).
Today 15 years later, is so visible that it was not a persecution, that even the older more powerful felt threatened that they are missing their consciousness of the need for a systematic almost sensitive psychosocial wave of extermination of the older just to make survive the public purse can not afford the cash values ​​and benefits to older retirees, or who want to continue to serve with their knowledge.
In my country, a former governor of a state to the south of this, had to borrow money from the World Bank can meet the payments of its retirees and pensioners, the elderly, many constitutions laws change with the older more unjust in contrast old.
End Mania chase.
It was a chase, yes, those speeches contained strong warning to the systematic disregard of the oldest major.
In the 90s I was a student at a major university and a good ability to reason, I could become a political leader and this could be the end to put plans in order that other people had the ability to manipulate the consciences of population. I left the plane to contrast the speeches even though the director of an academic center and with other favorable points curriculum and was trying to survive.
The reality that makes me happy is that in less time, I thought, there are already plans to replace the society, the deepest thoughts of psycho social, withdraw from society based on Darwinian thinking to the political thought of infuence manipulated or not Society.
Darwin has no relation to policy and public administration, is genocide.
He can only have their models related to the lower animals, they do not have the intelligence to make them negotiate, study, develop their skills.
They survive only by instinct if not by genetic evolution of their ancestors will always be decimated natural disasters or unnatural. We do not sometimes survive natural and unnatural disasters in just one generation. Not waiting instincts are built by the generations that have emerged as Darwin explains the survival of a species.
The human species survive a catastrophe independent of the instincts. Sometimes in less than a generation, the problem she sees, feels, if you let down and is restored.
Consider the development of natural and unnatural pandemics or infections. These are made by human error, or natural appearance of microorganisms, where the solution happens without that decrease the population in less than a generation. As an example we have the Spanish Flu, or bubonic plague, flu versus swine.
The first decimated the human population, if by Darwin, we would have to kill the most fragile with the flu and the plague generations and leaving the strongest to generate a new class of human strengths to it, to disappear.
On the contrary it made it disappear in less than a generation. Without the extermination of the weak, manufacture the medicines and vaccines and vitamins. We entered the prevention and remediation. When the model of Darwin, he presents the evolution preventative in animals?
We do not see remedial action.
The introduction of political discussion and elimination of the view that Darwin and evolution in the human species is good to see if the plan terminates once moronic devaluation of the older empiricism.
For those who enjoy movies or cinematrográficas arts, perhaps the influence of concern in my speech that system jerk anti gerontocratic (on older ones) could see the movie that I watched to 8 years old, I think it was a good influences on this topic, there are other more important topics in this film can be seen that this view is idiotic action by the Darwinian older. The movie “Soylent Green” (1973) director Richard Fleischer adapted a novel by Harry Harrison, with the famous Charlton Heston and Leigh Taylor-Young.
See the poster below:



See the video below.

See the construction of ecological living by Darwin, a group of animals, eg deer found in Africa, where it escape from predators, the stronger and more young people come out ahead because they are more agile and more purposefully leave gazelles frail and older back. They leave the deer just for predators to have the older as food and satiation. Will be satisfied and go away leaving them unmolested. On this view Darwin is a Darwinian model that well represents the evolution in the animal world. The strongest survive, and leave your strength in genetic code that left him alive. This will become instinct regarding genetic influence on behavior.
The exception to the rule of the animals to predators and preyed but strong, is only in the case of these predators wanting to take the puppies in rare excetions. In this case the strongest may have an intervention. The female becomes violent and even more agile to escape it returns to save the puppy. This applies well to Darwin because this makes the species is protected from extinction.
Feel inside Darwinnist calls to mind the latest political thought since there is a movie that was also called as the air after it was published the year. The film is the opposite of the first concern but it is interesting because he tries to mend the damage already installed reviewing a big mistake in Soviet culture in the Second World War. This shows that already in the 90 sets in the despair of something lost control and then you are starting to worry about the younger ones. I realized that connotation with the recall of religious institutions to the great movement of Catholic renacenstist phase with the concern of the child and the society then showed Jesus Christ in your cults like the baby Jesus. Something happened at the time that the Church was concerned, and puts the propaganda that gave birth to the movement of the Jesuits. Something learned in the classroom at the university, a reminder. For Education is learned that this movement is a revolution in education of human beings at the time. One begins to worry about education. And this concern can be seen in all media in the 90’s with great force that reaches out to the Media … for example I just assuming something that I always had skill, care for girls, something always easy as a child with my little aunts …
The film is beautiful, and teaches history and Soviet culture in the 40s in the middle of World War II despite novel is a true fact, and the director tries to focus on something that clearly seems to have taken courses to return as culture. I think this may have happened please. The observations suggest that the central figure already discussed might have been placed as a cultural practice. I realize this because I had a deceased brother, we were both students university public in Brazil. Both were very strong to survive the negative cultural impacts was established, and many complained. Not so with many others was always discussed the erroneous idea of ​​parents choosing to have children a stronger and preferable for failing in their despair, all lead to the survival of a catastrophe, or any large problem happened. My mother gave an educational trend not to differentiate the two had the same chances and were forced to be strong without penalty at the same time and resistents. I had to treat one another and more. The film shows clearly that the interim but should see hysteria existing collective unconscious in the 90 and 2000. If you see that with these films, which was already discussed in a research setting in psychology and education of children and the issue of differentiation of education either. Introdution becomes strongly in all media … Even away from him. Something happens that cares so well with children.
In my view is the imbecility of the Darwinian model that had seen hysteria of those who are powerful in-depth see something already hysterical and inserted in the society in which they teem to manage. They fund projects for extensive observation of children’s topic.
Watch the movie “Attack on Leningrad” (2009) director Aleksandr Buravsky with Gabriel Byrne and Mira Sorvino.See the poster below:


See the video below:
But for humans that would be stupid, discard the oldest. Let the elders to predation and just run for the youngest would be after a while not knowing which is the crucial tool to protect human beings. In humans, as you know that knowledge is something much more valuable for example the high speed of a gazelle to the predator, or by the cold, just using the intelligence, and stuck with the oldest who holds the knowledge of how to quickly and instantly memory of something called a civilization.
Finally, humans do not have the older ones would have to be using the same search time ever, “rediscovering the wheel” because it would have an older one around, just to say that it worked or not something in the past. The library, the older, reading books and writing are memories. They are sacred records.
Read “The Name of the Rose” Umberto  Eco, and see what I had to rarefy as called in the 80’s. Do not just watch the content of whodunit as the film shows and many lead only to see it. This is the error. Aristoteles, the verb, the laughter, the Italian Dante is commoner raised in Italy, Latin as a tool, and the aisles of a library holds the secret at all that can be said of these troubled times, reading, language, and not target language (which incidentally is the error of the popular saying that would mimic the metalanguage they want to induce young people and police, the meta-language that comes from my basic education is the meta-mathematical language, with “therefore”, “any that is, “” equals <=> “,” equal =, “” less -, “” more, “all they need in their writing to code quickly and give their written notes for their reports summarized in the report).
This book is an induction of the Italian Umberto Eco editor to publish what he had then that was a giant text study and research, an essay in Media.
A good article below containing yes, good information. I hope it becomes again a call one day for the younger more enlightened.

Liberals’ View of Darwin Unable to Evolve

by  Ann Coulter
08/31/2011
Full text >> http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45893

Note: If you have a message for me on economics. Forget it, I got that message, with the military dictatorship in 1976 prohibiting the discipline in universities in Brazil and Latin I think the chair of Political Economy) at the time I did a short course to enter the school of the Air Cadets when my math teacher interrupted class to communicate more of a dictatorship at the time was that such a ban. All we had 13 years. And we are watching and obviously traumatized. There was no mention of this in the classroom in regular school. It was a refresher course for the military had not The prevalence of cassation. We could hear.
The message, I was given the same time I ate a big plate caiçara, there at the port of Santos, which was Mecca. This message was given to me as fondly despite the military I was creating a strong critic of the military regime. I grew up in criticism of them. My uncle was in the military police dictatorship. And I strongly criticized. When I was 19 in 1983, an admiral, Admiral Karan tells his nephew the son of the former Financial Director of the State Attorney General where I worked, this one. A discussion of editing Marx seized in the 70’s entitled “Political Economy” and has in its collection.
A work done in the Faculty of Law University of São Paulo in 1969 by Professor Pinto Fagundes and printed in the administration of former director of the Center for Academic XI August A. J. Luciano. A worthy gift for someone who years later also became director of an Academic Center at the University Sao Paulo and did not realize at the time that would be such.
Please “Political Economy”, but “Geopolitics” is not. This is what I use to understand how to play almost everything I see and let me bore in terms of international politics and not something else internationally.
Geopolitics is a matter that I had to necessarily have to study, because by the time I got the book I was a staunch critic of the late Professor Hemerit Milton Santos he had geopolitics. He did, was that I did have to study this matter that both staunchly argued while he was alive and I was a student of geology. Geopolitics was only a point of peace between me and him. Because when he came in the genetic matter, he did a lot of people argue with him when I was close. He then did not accept the rules of the projection that many of us had to go. Take long for him to accept. These discussions have led me to learn a lot about the behavior aside racial, genetic and gerontology. To argue that studying was much talk with many people at the university. But old is good and this is another one that I miss the old. He avenge one of the good sides of a good project that the Brazilian university could do. I hope that one day they rescue.

Good Week

Benedito Ubiratã

Benedito Ubirata Benedito Ubirata
A long time ago, I read two writers, one German and one Brazilian. One was Eric Fromm, and the other was Marina Colasanti. In the mid-80s. I was a civil servant in the late afternoon and spent my time in the library that was halfway to my house. It was there until closing at 10 pm. Days had already known each other patrons of the library. With coffee breaks at the bar in front, and smoking a cigarette and then back. Sometimes a nap, and then rush out to watch a show that had music in the outskirts of the library. It was a very good time. Would always reading books and observing that this literature had, and tried to follow the reading to see if it was worth continuing the reasoning of the writer. But I was always away from matters of psychology and psychoanalysis. It was a choice I did not like the idea of ​​devoting myself to people as a way to work. I was young and was in training looking for a line to follow in my life. But like all young, at least I think so, I had some doubts about human beings and their behavior. I started looking for books that could take me some doubts. I read a few books devoted to Buddhism, and novels that many of the characters also became Buddhists. As always, the speech was human behavior, needed to have a basis for thinking and to discuss with friends during the time that we met. I ended up stumbling upon the book by Eric Fromm, a psychoanalyst widely read in the 70 and 80. Many spoke of him and so I have chosen the various options that today I would say that would be too deep in the area of ​​human behavior. As I had already established that I liked the Eastern view of the planet (not westernized or platonic) always gave preference to recommendations of writers or curiosity of human behavior that were in the eastern form of analysis. The base was Jung. Although Carl Jung was a follower of Freud, he opted for the Eastern view. A coexistence with the Hindu or Buddhism in observing and writing. And Erich Fromm had an eastern view, very little Plato and Jung and line. In it there were several comments on the human comportment, for example the explanation of his view of personality and character. And for example something that did not agree, a division into four types of character. For example people who had mercantile character, or visionary character and others. But in the middle of the book he did the analysis and explanation of how he saw love. In this respect I felt really consistent with it. For he explained that there were two loves, love common among humans, and particular love of the mother or maternal love. In these two loves he made the difference that only two of the mother was unconditional. That is, only the maternal love had no conditions to impose. A mother dies of love for his son. It made me happy and consistent with the way he see the love. It was different from the view of the Romantic literary school that I learned how they had a vision of love in that partners sometimes even killed themselves in grief. The love of Renaissance Romanticism after school. It was the love that hurt my vision when I read novels or movies. Everything looks sickly. That love only applies when a son or daughter feels her mother’s love. Has no replacement. From there I really facilitated my analysis of all the people I saw in the middle of my life. The transfers, orders of protection, the lack of care, and other aspects that was linked to the lack of maternal love that person could have had. It was a transformative reading, as I did not want to be a psychologist, took the psychological education for me. It was a stage when my mother smiled, took gifts, ran behind the documentation of your retirement and traveled with her. Explained a lot. And today it can analyze the differences before my mother and my mother today. The everything that happened in the middle of the road. How are psychotic and paranoid people who have influenced my mother. Setting a whole theory that today I am grateful to see so at the height of one of my phases, I could not realize that mine was leaving me in the face of so much pain and suffering. I spent two years addressing this theory to weaken those who watched my mother was missing and then found out that she was influenced. I can see the difference and influencing people to characterize, when I’m near and far. I see her intentions and other people. The other reading was more interesting was the reverse of the pleasure of reading and want to know the writer. Thursday was a day of vernissagens in my town, and I attended a workshop of art, or rather an art workshop, where teachers had monitors that will let us paint our wills and practice in art and guided us when had doubts. We sent books to read history of art with painters who had a coincidence with what we wanted. Finally, they taught them to fashion, or want to learn to look for the library shelf that we could find what we wanted. And like every Thursday at the end of class, did not have to do, the friends who attended always showed up with ideas of places to spend the rest of the night. It was a multi ethnic group. We had almost the same age, and experiences of each were different in different countries and we went walking around the city center. Where to find free food and wine. Then one day indicated in the release of a book by a writer. We walked there. Almost an hour of walking, a lot of noise and shouting. And then we come … When I went as usual straight to the wine and the food. However education asked the owner to seek release of the book. Off we went, and then I saw the vision that today I laugh when I remember. The popular view that the person has something. I heard a little in silence, paying attention and noticed the face of the writer. I was raised for wine and meals. Days after I decided to read the book. I did not remember what she discussed on launch day, for at that meeting she was giving a lecture. And reading the book I came across something that I find interesting in today’s women. Affectionately in his writing, she wrote something that interested me. The male and female phased approach. And taking the approach phase total that would be the marriage or to live in the same house and have children and raise a family. What caught my attention was the fact that it describe the approach phase of the woman with the man or vice versa. She described that dating would not let anything be a phase of rapprochement and a chance to know the couple. If you study personally. This was ingrained in my mind for years. It was obvious what she explained. But now reading political and psychosocial events in some countries around the world can not understand the need for women wanting to study the man before approaching him without even knowing. This is not mating, but a form of domination. When one is studying the other, he dominates the study. This is not to be in partnership, having a partner, be a couple. And yes having a function of domain know where all the other steps because previous studies. In the case of women, reading as many feminist existentialist Simone de Beauvoir. Could not they see that domination by a positive example of feminism. The result would stifle the ability of women to live, spending time with the man personality and then demonstrate that it has something much more important than an object. After all it simply exists. Mastering does not exist. It is not a woman, is only one dominant that even a man can do is study a woman without her knowledge for a long time. There would be no distinction of better or worse, would only be a dominatrix. The domain may function in psychiatry could fit in psychosis, after all the sadism is considered an unhealthy form of psychiatry. a psychosis. Always need a sadistic master, having all the time and steps in your mind of the victim. Studying a male to female is just transform it into a sadistic, psychotic one. After Pavlov teaches that every living being can be affected, and conditions if you want a woman to study for master, or tame a man will take her normal position of position of psychosis, as psychiatry sees that psychosis may be a factor of influence not only genetic but also by influential environmental or environmental conditioning. I remembered this today, I realize that the love with the simple teaching taught by Marina Colasanti amuito lost time from many places society on the planet. I do not think there is the possibility of returning psychological women who have become accustomed, or better condition if left with the idea to be watching, studying the man without knowing for a while to try to register all forms of this reasoning. Makes it predictable before live. Paranoia.
So I have these two aspects of an unconditional love just be motherly, and the other to study the predictability of the partner, two things are psychotic. You can not want a man with unconditional love because it’s the woman she is who has the painful gestation of the child. And the lover of the previous study a form of conditioning psychosis.
What will happen to those countries who are governed by these methods of influence in the population I have more or less an idea. But this idea is not pleasant.
Good week
Benedito Ubiratã
Benedito Ubirata Benedito Ubirata

Some politicians forget that African descent who participated in the American Civil War, were slaves, but slaves were not helped when. They fought by parents and masters were regarded as free. These politicians call for collaboration african descent but end up breaking the Constitution itself, forget that slavery is against the law, and transform the collaboration in slavery, where the gain and only what you have. This is slavery, be unlawful. So participating in this ritual but not ask to be recognized, not being seen, or be known. To not be charged. This story of suffering and deception is decimating the world population over 20 years of requests for favors in manipulation of our emotional side. Be a crime.

They manipulate our emotions, let us ask for emotional warmth with more and more collaboration and always leave us with no political base and we always end up being persecuted and killed. This ritual will still make a big stage is just like the last great phase in the planet. Slavery through a ritual of human emotive employees and kills them without social recognition. If so decimated the population that actually produces intellectually be so small that everyone is getting sick of fatigue, with the excuse that is dwindling by elements of a natural anomaly. Just be the result of human slavery by politicians and people who take advantage of our existence. The calculations are good at revenge, will have no economy, or society that can sustain themselves with this mode of vision. Each major phase adjustments are giant bankruptcies economic systems.

The last was in 2009, will take will not have another. And it will be higher.

Read Full text?

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/additional-publications/civil-war/p20.htm

Black Dispatches

Black DispatchesUnion officers got so many valuable pieces of intelligence from slaves that the reports were put in a special category: “Black Dispatches.” Runaway slaves, many of them conscripted to work on Confederate fortifications, gave the Union Army a continually flowing stream of intelligence. So did slaves who volunteered to be stay-in-place agents.
Tens of thousands of ex-slaves fought and died for the Union in military units. Less known is the work of other African-Americans who risked their lives in secret, gathering intelligence or while entering enemy territory as scouts. Brigadier General Grenville M. Dodge mentioned how he used black scouts during a search for Confederate troops in Tennessee: “Two negroes led our cavalry to them, guiding them around their pickets. No white man had the pluck to do it.”
Throughout the official records of the war, there are frequent references to bits of intelligence coming from “contrabands.” The term tracks back to a demand for runaway slaves from a Virginia slaveowner who cited the Fugitive Slave Law when he learned that his slaves had fled to Union territory. Responding, Major General Benjamin Butler said that since secession, Virginia had not been under federal law. Butler referred to the slaves as “contraband of war,” and the term caught on.
In a typical report: “Three contrabands came in from Fort Johnson yesterday. They were officers’ servants, and report, from conversation of the officers there, that north and northwest faces of Fort Sumter are nearly as badly breached as the gorge wall, and that many of our projectiles passed through both walls, and that the fort contains no serviceable guns.”
George Scott escaped from a plantation near Yorktown and headed for Fort Monroe, at the mouth of the James River on the tip of the Virginia peninsula. On the way, he noted two large fortifications. To gather more intelligence, Scott joined a Union officer on scouting missions. On one such mission, Scott was the target of a Confederate picket, whose bullet missed Scott’s body, but put a hole in his jacket. Another slave worked on the defenses of Leesburg. He escaped, bringing with him his detailed observations about the deployment of 5,000 Confederate troops. Many other slaves provided similar information about Confederate plans and maneuvers.
While Allan Pinkerton was serving as Major General George D. McClellan’s intelligence chief, the private detective ordered a careful debriefing of runaway slaves, some of whom he personally recruited to go back as agents. One of Pinkerton’s black agents was John Scobell of Mississippi, who had been educated and freed by his owner. Scobell used the cover of servant to two other Pinkerton agents, Timothy Webster and Carrie Lawton, when they operated in Richmond. Scobell also posed as a cook and a laborer on his trips south, where he often signed up black couriers for the Union at secret meetings of the Legal League, an underground slave organization.
Another black spy for Pinkerton was W. H. Ringgold, a free man who had been forced to work on a Virginia riverboat that was moving Confederate troops and supplies. After about six months, he and the other crewmen were allowed to return to the North. Debriefed by Pinkerton, Ringgold told all he knew about Confederate fortifications on the Virginia peninsula. When McClellan began his peninsula campaign in March 1862, the best intelligence he had was from Ringgold.
The Union Navy also profited from Black Dispatches. Robert Smalls, a free African American who was a harbor pilot knowledgeable about Fernandina, Florida, noticed that Confederates were preparing to destroy the harbor as they withdrew. He realized that Fernandina would provide the Union with a good port for blockade ships patrolling Charleston.
In March 1862, Smalls rowed out to a Union warship and reported what he had seen. The fleet, waiting to attack Fernandina, moved swiftly before the damage was done and captured the port. In another instance, Smalls loaded his family and other African-American sailors aboard a Confederate patrol ship in Charleston, calmly gave the correct countersigns to Confederate signals as he sailed her out of the harbor, and surrendered her to a Union blockade ship. He and the crew were rewarded with half the value of the captured ship.
Mary Touvestre, a freed slave, worked as a housekeeper for one of the Confederate engineers who were repairing the U.S. Navy’s Merrimac. The steam-powered frigate had been partially burned on April 21, 1861, when Federal forces abandoned the Gosport Navy Yard. Rebuilt as an ironclad, she was renamed the C.S.S. Virginia. Touvestre overheard the engineers talking about the ship and realized its significance as a weapon against the Northern blockade. Traveling at great risk with a stolen set of plans, she made her way to Washington and got an audience with officials in the Department of the Navy.
Surprised by the momentum of the Confederate project, the officials speeded up the building of the Union ironclad, the Monitor. Some historians believe that if the former slave had not carried her warning to Washington, the Virginia might have had several unchallenged weeks for a rampage against vulnerable Union ships, thwarting the blockade long enough for the arrival of desperately needed supplies from Europe.
Harriet Tubman, one of the nation’s most famous African-Americans, was also one of the war’s most daring and effective spies. She is renowned as a conductor of the Underground Railroad. Her espionage work, like that of many black spies, is far less known. But her exploits, centered along the South Carolina coast, are well documented, mostly because they were military operations.
Early in 1863, after she had spent nearly a year caring for refugee slaves, Union officers in South Carolina decided that she would be more valuable as a covert operative. She was asked to assemble a small reconnaissance unit of ex-slaves who knew the region and could gather timely intelligence. She found nine men, some of them riverboat pilots who knew every inch of the waterways threading through the coastal lowlands. One of her tasks was the finding of “torpedoes,” as remotely-detonated mines were called then, placed along the waterways patrolled by Union river craft.
Her spying and scouting evolved into a kind of special forces operation under Colonel James Montgomery. A fervent believer in guerrilla warfare, Montgomery was a veteran of antislavery border fighting in Kansas. Like Tubman, he had met and admired firebrand abolitionist John Brown.
In July 1863, Tubman became Montgomery’s second-incommand during a night raid up the Combahee River, near Beaufort, South Carolina. The Union gunboats, carrying some 300 black troops, slipped up the river, eluding torpedoes that Tubman’s men had spotted. Undetected, the raiders swarmed ashore, destroyed a Confederate supply depot, torched homes and warehouses, and rounded up more than 750 rice plantation slaves.
“The enemy,” said a Confederate report on the raid, “seems to have been well posted as to the character and capacity of our troops … and to have been well guided by persons thoroughly acquainted with the river and country.” Unwittingly, the report was praising the work of slaves working for Tubman.
Reporting on the raid to Secretary of War Stanton, Brigadier General Rufus Saxton said, “This is the only military command in American history wherein a woman, black or white, led the raid, and under whose inspiration. it was originated and conducted.” Tubman’s spies added to the heroic chronicles of the Black Dispatches. “This source of information,” said one historian, “represented the single most prolific and productive category of intelligence obtained and acted on by Union forces throughout the Civil War.”
One of the boldest—and least known—Northern spies of the war was a free African American who went under cover as a slave in what appears to have been a plan to place her in the official residence of Confederate President Jefferson Davis.
The residence, called the Richmond White House, served as the Davis home and the President’s executive office. While he conducted Confederacy business there, he would not have seen his slaves as a threat to security. Official papers did not have to be given special protection when slaves were around because, by law, slaves had to be illiterate.
Elizabeth Van Lew well knew this law, and, while running her spy ring in Richmond, realized the espionage value of a slave who was secretly able to read and write. Van Lew had a perfect candidate for such an agent-inplace role: Mary Elizabeth Bowser.
The wealthy Van Lew family, which had 21 slaves in 1850, had only two by 1860—both of them elderly women. Yet, Virginia and Richmond archives show that the Van Lews had not gone through the legal procedures for the freeing of slaves. Freedom meant exile. Under Virginia law, freed slaves had to leave Virginia within a year after winning their freedom. Only by ignoring that law could Van Lew carry out the audacious placement of an agent in the Richmond White House.
Elizabeth Van Lew and her widowed mother Eliza raised the eyebrows of their social acquaintances in Richmond in 1846 by having a slave baptized as Mary Jane Richards in St. John’s Episcopal Church, revered as the site where Patrick Henry said, “Give me liberty or give me death.” Later, Elizabeth sent Mary Jane off to Philadelphia for an education. In 1855, Mary Jane sailed to Liberia, the African nation founded by Americans as a colony for ex-slaves.
On March 5, 1860, a ship bearing Mary Jane Richards arrived in Baltimore. She went on to Richmond—an illegal act for a freed slave. Five months later, she was arrested for “perambulating the streets and claiming to be a free person of color….” She was briefly jailed and released after Elizabeth Van Lew paid a $10 fine and claimed that Mary Jane was still a slave. This declaration would give her perfect cover as an agent. Mary Jane Richards married and became Mary Elizabeth Bowser. It is under that name that she enters Civil War espionage history.
Information about her is scanty. One good source is Thomas McNiven, who posed as a baker while making daily rounds as a Van Lew agent in Richmond. From him, down the years, came the report that she “had a photographic mind” and “Everything she saw on the Rebel President’s Desk, she could repeat word for word.”
Jefferson Davis’ widow, Varina, responding to an inquiry in 1905, denied that the Richmond White House had harbored a spy. “I had no ‘educated negro’ in my household,” she wrote. She did not mention that her coachman, William A. Jackson, had crossed into Union lines, bringing with him military conversations that he had overheard. In a letter from Major General Irvin McDowell to Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton, “Jeff Davis’ coachman” is cited as the source of information about Confederate deployments. A butler who served Jefferson Davis also made his way to Union lines.
Although McDowell and other Union generals could attest to the value of the Black Dispatches, the best endorsement came from General Robert E. Lee. “The chief source of information to the enemy,” he wrote, “is through our negroes.”

The Conductor Becomes a Spy

Harriet Tubman

Harriet Ross was born into slavery in Maryland in 1819 or 1820. She was whipped when she was a small child, and, when she was 15 years old, was struck on the head by a scale weight hurled at a slave she was helping escape. The injury produced a lifelong suffering from headaches and seizures. When she was 25 years old, she married John Tubman, a free African-American. About four years later, when her master died, she feared that she and her kin would be sold and scattered. So she began to think about escaping. Her husband declined to go with her, as did her brothers.
The courage and skill she used in her escape she would later use again as a spy for the Union.
Harriet Tubman fled to the North on the Underground Railroad, the network of abolitionists who helped slaves make their way to freedom. After freeing herself, she returned to Maryland, became a conductor on the railroad, and brought out members of her family. She made a score of dangerous trips, helping some 300 slaves reach the North. With each trip, she taught herself the ways of covert work behind enemy lines.
In 1857, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Dred Scott, a black man who had moved from a free state to a slave state, had no right to sue for his freedom because African-Americans could not be citizens; the court also ruled that Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories. The decision emboldened slaveholders and put Tubman in even more jeopardy. But, in that same year, she slipped into Maryland and conducted her elderly parents to freedom.
Because of fugitive slave laws, escapees could find ultimate freedom only in Canada. Tubman went frequently to the main underground terminal in Canada, St. Catherines, Ontario. There she met John Brown, who told her of his plans for an armed raid on Harpers Ferry. She later said that if she had not been ill at the time, she would have joined in the raid.
Tubman went to war in May 1861, joining a Union force dispatched to her native Maryland, which was a hotbed of Southern sympathizers. There, she knew, her knowledge of the land would be helpful to Union troops. Later, she served in the Union’s Fort Monroe in Virginia. But it would be at her next duty post, in South Carolina, that she would become a full-fledged undercover operative.
In the spring of 1862, Tubman sailed from New York City to Beaufort, South Carolina, the operations center for Union forces that held the southeastern coast of South Carolina. She was sent to the region at the suggestion of Massachusetts Governor John Andrew, who believed that “she would be a valuable person to operate within the enemy’s lines in procuring information & scouts.”
The Union-held area was a magnet for slaves fleeing to freedom. Tubman helped to clothe and feed them while also setting up agent networks and conferring with Union officers, including Colonel James Montgomery. He made her his second-in-command for the night raid up the Combahee River that freed more than 750 plantation slaves.
After the war, Harriet Tubman lived on a small farm in Auburn, New York. Years before, William A. Seward, then an anti-slavery senator from New York—later to be Lincoln’s Secretary of State—had sold her the property and arranged for a mortgage. She continued to help exslaves and black veterans and supported the crusade for women’s suffrage. In 1869, two years after the death of John Tubman, she married Nelson Davis, an ex-slave whom she had met when he was a Union soldier.
Citing her work for the Union Army, especially the Combahee River raid, she petitioned for a pension. A member of Congress who had been a Union general backed her claim, noting “her services in the various capacities of nurse, scout, and spy.” But not until 1890, two years after the death of Davis, did she receive a pension of eight dollars a month. By then, she was in poverty, and neighbors were providing her with food. Nine years later, her monthly pension was raised to twenty dollars.
In 1903, she donated the farm to a church group on the condition that the home be maintained as a refuge for “aged and indigent colored people” and that she be allowed to live in the house for the rest of her life. In 1913, the woman known in the Union Army as “the General” died and was buried with military honors.

Historical Document
Posted: Mar 21, 2007 04:14 PM
Last Updated: Dec 12, 2008 08:33 AM

Last Reviewed: May 04, 2007 04:23 PM
—————————————————————————————————

Sorry
and
Good week

Benedito Ubirata

Benedito Ubirata Benedito Ubirata

It was all I needed in the 80’s specifically in the 88th, when I traveled to Rio de Janeiro and strange facts gave me a good home. I won a beer truck overturned in an accident with no victims in the BR 116 highway, where I filled the car that I travel with about 100 cans of beer on the road to the state of Rio de Janeiro. When I arrived, I came across the avenue Brazil in a state of high violence, with people making barricades to steal the vehicles traveling at dawn.
I slept in a house that had a spirit that wanted to drink alcohol and satanic worship rituals, I woke up going to tour the south of Rio de Janeiro to see the new world I did not know. When I came across natives showing the crucial problems of the state.
I left there not knowing what happened. I had many questions that I thought of the state, the questions were internal and I could not answer scholarly. I replied only that the Rio de Janeiro had to change but had no theoretical insight, erudtia, Citati.
I saw many movies and appeared when the Rio de Janeiro felt I should not see them. Something was missing and the years have passed and still not understand what I needed. The two historical facts gave me the answer, too late but gave me the answer.
This article shows what I needed to answer those who wondered about the Rio de Janeiro Guanabara or old, former capital of Brazil that the natives in the 80s I had shown that large losses by having the transfer of capital to Brasilia , the current capital. But I needed the theoretical discourse, with what I needed to signal that I watched for a positive Americanization, but with no legal advice, social, psychosocial.
This text shows all in theoretical terms than needed that state. We can not align ourselves to the system. We in Brazil are still anti Semitic, racist to the very changes that happened in the United States of America in the 90’s already trying to create icons for if they had the weakest countries in a good example, and we one of the weakest countries resistiamos this change. In another article below, by its historical presentation, shows the attempt of the Bush Sr. trying to create a new icon to the North American system of government and the world. Try putting in the Supreme Court a conservative view of African descent and strongly supported by the giants of the United States of America who wanted to change your view of white supremacy, which invaded the world culture.
And they in turn leave that culture invading the world connected to them, would be to own North American, a great loss, especially after a victory in the Second World War against one of the worst moves that the history of mankind can have Nazism.
They could not let them be an icon of influence to many cultures in the world, had the origin of birth of the movement already defeated again in 1945, Nazism.
Bush has that sensitivity and tries to recreate the North American vision in the world have not only african only celebrity offspring that happened in that period of the decade 80 to 90 with actors such Academy of Hollywood, but based on politics, culture, the intellectuals and scholarship. They needed only the end of African descent as musicians, dancers or artists.
The appointment of an African descent Thomas aa North American Supreme Court was a modification of this view inside the country and the world.
What saddens me is that today I understand the negative and destructive criticism of Brazilian intellectuals and educated the new North American trend. It saddens me because it gives the direction of the new  in line political and social moment in Brazil.
Since 1989, Brazil entered a culture war and influence the way North American confuse everyone and everything so hard that a few here in my country survived because they saw that parents needed to align and change because these changes could be beneficial the parents. I was almost killing the Brazilian media highly racist and anti Semitic.
They leave no ethnically oppressed classes in the 40’s and 50 degree climb and position to be good examples to the same ethnic group that needed good examples and dominant ethnic groups who wanted to modify.
These two articles I fully explain what I needed to discuss in the midst of Humanities that I avoided attending for more than 10 years at the university I studied and got kicked out for being of African descent. They members of the Human Sciences University asked me to participate, but I had no feeling.
I saw, but had no basis. It is 20 years.

read the texts:

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 09:45 E

Two decades later, Clarence Thomas is still a (relatively) young justice

The

HAATEAMATQ/YouTube
Clarence Thomas and former president George H.W. Bush

Most Americans had never heard of Clarence Thomas when President George H.W. Bush nominated him for the Supreme Court 20 years ago this month. Bush, who announced his pick in Kennebunkport, Maine on July 1, 1991, called the thinly credentialed Thomas the “best qualified” person for the seat vacated by retiring Justice Thurgood Marshall, a giant of the law who had argued the landmark Brown v. Board of Education case and was the Court’s first African-American justice.
Thomas had only been a federal judge for a year when Bush tapped him for the Supreme Court, and the gap in stature compared to Marshall, the man he would replace, set the terms for the rancorous fight that followed. Democrats charged the White House with playing racial politics with an unqualified candidate on the assumption that they wouldn’t dare oppose an African-American.
The media covered Thomas as though Bush had plucked the 43-year-old from obscurity, but Washington’s legal community was not surprised by the nomination. “Everyone assumed when Thurgood Marshall resigned, the seat had to be filled by an African-American,” said Nan Aron, president of the progressive Alliance for Justice. “When Thomas went up for the DC Circuit, we knew it was a done deal. He was groomed for the seat.”
Republicans saw a political opening, thinking they could win over some voters with what Bush viewed as an historic appointment. Thomas’ race mattered, but he was chosen as much for his reliable conservative ideology as the color of his skin. The rallying cry then was “No More Souters,” recalled Aron, referring to Justice David Souter, who Bush had appointed to the Court the previous year, and whose voting record was looking very liberal and angering the GOP’s conservative base.

With Thomas, the White House felt they had a conservative they could count on. His work as a political appointee at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Department of Education was antagonistic to civil-rights, and he had no legal track record of consequence, no writings that the opposition could pick apart, and no known opinions about Roe v Wade that could trip him up.
From the White House perspective, Thomas was the natural person to fill the Marshall seat. Former Republican Senator Jack Danforth, who had given Thomas his first job out of Yale Law School and whose support would prove pivotal, recalled in a recent phone interview that “the vice president (Dan Quayle) called me and said, ‘Would you do for Clarence Thomas what (New Hampshire Senator) Warren Rudman did for David Souter,’ which was all out support, which I did.”
Asked if 20 years later he has any regrets, Danforth said, “No, None,” adding that he is “terribly proud” of Thomas and the way he has performed as a justice, and, like Thomas, still angry and embittered over the way he was treated in the confirmation process. “What was he accused of — talking dirty?” Danforth said, “that was it — and the same people who would defend President Clinton for having sex with an intern in the Oval Office were all over Clarence Thomas for allegedly saying something. It was an outrage, an abomination.”
Even before Anita Hill, a law professor who had worked with Thomas testified about his inappropriate remarks, the politics had spun out of control. The reason, says Danforth, was Roe v. Wade and the determination on both sides to block any justice that would vote the wrong way. When the stakes are that emotional, there are no rules, he says, even now lamenting the fact that Thomas with his reputation on trial on national television did not have legal counsel “compared to the quality of defense for somebody like Casey Anthony.”
These are fighting words to the other side, where progressives like Nan Aron point out there were other issues than a few off-color remarks that caused concern about Thomas, from ethical lapses to his undistinguished legal record. The American Bar Association gave him a mixed rating, and President Bush, after initially declaring him the “best qualified person” he could find, quickly dropped the phrase. Thomas was confirmed on October 15, 1991 by 52 to 48, garnering the fewest votes of any justice in more than a century.
The passage of time has not softened attitudes on either side. Thomas called the searing experience a “high-tech lynching,” and remains a distant and silent figure on the Court. His memoir, “My Grandfather’s Son,” published four years ago, reveals a life of real and perceived slights, along with towering grudges.
He rarely speaks in oral arguments, which his critics interpret as a sign of inferior legal acuity. Danforth says that Thomas told him that he thinks that time belongs to the lawyers arguing their case before the Court. For many, it’s the high point of their career, and he doesn’t like to interrupt. He has offered other explanations, including insecurity about his Pin Point, Ga. accent dating back to when he navigated the elite environs of Yale and the East Coast governing class.
Thomas’ confirmation, painful as it was for both him and his principal accuser, generated enough outrage among women to elect a record number of women to Congress the following year. A lot has changed in 20 years, and Thomas is no Thurgood Marshall, which is exactly what Bush intended. For conservatives, Thomas is the gift that keeps on giving. Having just turned 63, he could well be there harboring his resentments as an anchor on the right for another 20 years.
  • Eleanor Clift is a contributor to Newsweek and the Daily Beast, and a panelist on “The McLaughlin Group.” More: Eleanor Clift

——————————————————————————————————————

Tuesday, Jul 5, 2011 07:01 ET

The three fundamentalisms of the American right

How conservatism went from orthodox and traditional to radical and counter-revolutionary

http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/07/05/lind_three_fundamentalisms/index.html

In contradiction to the hostility to Darwinism shared by many of its constituents, the American right is evolving rapidly before our eyes. The project of creating an American version of Burkean conservatism has collapsed. What has replaced it is best described as triple fundamentalism — a synthesis of Biblical fundamentalism, constitutional fundamentalism and market fundamentalism.
Following World War II, the American right was a miscellany of marginal, embittered subcultures — anti-New Dealers, isolationists, paranoid anticommunists, anti-semites and white supremacists. Russell Kirk and others associated with William F. Buckley Jr.’s National Review sought to Americanize a version of high-toned British Burkean conservatism. While the eighteenth century British parliamentarian was embraced by conservatives for his opposition to the French Revolution, Edmund Burke, a champion of the rights of Britain’s Indian, Irish and American subjects, could also be claimed by liberals like Yale Law School’s Alexander Bickel, who preferred gradual, cautious reform to radical social experimentation. In its liberal as in its conservative forms, Burkeanism disdains reaction and radicalism alike, and favors change in lesser things when necessary to maintain the continuity of more fundamental institutions and values.
The religious equivalent of Burkean politics is orthodoxy, not fundamentalism. Orthodoxy means the continuity of a tradition, as interpreted by an authoritative body of experts, such as priests, rabbis or mullahs. The term “fundamentalism” originated in the early twentieth century as a description of reactionary evangelical Protestants in the U.S. who rejected liberal Protestantism and modern evolutionary science and insisted on the inerrancy of the Bible. The phrase is nowadays applied indiscriminately and often inaccurately to various religious movements, some of which, in the Catholic, Jewish and Muslim traditions are better described as ultra-orthodox.
America’s Burkean conservatives like Kirk tended to favor Catholicism or the Anglo-Catholic school within the Anglican church. For them, establishment and hierarchy were terms of praise. But once white Southerners captured the Republican party and the conservative movement, the High Church right that found Kirk and Buckley among its college of cardinals gave way to the political equivalent of the Foot-Washin’ Baptists.
Today Protestant fundamentalism is associated with the Scots-Irish in the Bible Belt from West Virginia to Texas, but its ancestry lies in now-secular New England and the Midwest and it migrated southward only after the Civil War. As Burke observed at the time of the American revolution:

“All Protestantism…is a sort of dissent. But the religion most prevalent in our northern colonies is a refinement on the principle of resistance: it is the dissidence of dissent and the protestantism of the Protestant religion.”

It is also the populism of Populism. As an intermediary between the soul and God, the church hierarchy has been all but replaced by the Bible in fundamentalist Protestantism. Nor is there any need for theologians to expound the Bible, which was conveniently written in English so that it can be understood by any plain American.
The increasingly-Southernized American Right has transferred the fundamentalist Protestant mentality from the sphere of religion to the spheres of law and the economy. Protestant fundamentalism is now joined by constitutional fundamentalism and market fundamentalism.
In all three cases, the pattern is the same. There is the eternal Truth that never varies — the will of God, the principles of the Founding Fathers, the so-called laws of the free market. There are the scriptures which explain the eternal truths — the King James Bible, in the case of religious fundamentalism, the Constitution or the Federalist Papers, in the case of constitutional fundamentalism, and Friedrich von Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom in the case of market fundamentalism (The Fountainhead or Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand can be substituted for Hayek, on request).
“There’s only one book you ever need to read,” a Bible-believin’ Texan Baptist once assured me. He was two books short of a populist conservative bookshelf. But in the age of post-intellectual, fundamentalist conservatism, three books are sufficient to make anyone the equal of the most erudite intellectual. The books need not actually be read, and for the most part probably are not; it is enough, in argument, to thump the Bible, and to thump “The Road to Serfdom” and “Atlas Shrugged,” too.
The mentality of fundamentalism, not Burkean conservative traditionalism, underlies the rewriting of American constitutional history by the Straussians associated with the Claremont Institute in Cailfornia and of American economic history by conservative propagandists like Amity Shlaes. Burkeans viewed the history of British and American freedom as a gradually unfolding process of — dare it be said?–evolution, in which useful innovations, after suitable probation, could be incorporated as elements of the tradition. This “Catholic” view of political history is incompatible with the “Protestant” view of right-wing political fundamentalism, which transfers the script of radical Protestantism to the realms of political history and economics.
History, to the fundamentalist mind, is a story of original perfection, followed by betrayal and restoration. The early Christian church was perfect; it was corrupted and betrayed by medieval Catholicism; and it was restored to its original purity by radical Protestant reformers. In the same way, the American constitution was not a flawed compromise among rival states and factions, to be improved by later amendment, but a document of superhuman wisdom, created in a kind of secular Pentecost at Philadelphia in the summer of 1787. To believe today’s constitutional fundamentalists, the true constitution was betrayed around 1900 in the name of the “living constitution” by progressives and liberals, who play the villain’s role in political history that the evangelicals assign to the Catholic Church in Christian history.
Modern American market fundamentalism, too, is recognizably modeled on the fundamentalist Protestant version of church history, even though market fundamentalists need not be Christian conservatives. Ignoring the long history of tariffs, land grants, military procurement and mixed public-private corporations in the United States, the market fundamentalists pretend that the U.S. was governed by the laws of the market until Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal replaced capitalism with socialism (or statism, or fascism, or whatever Amity Shlaes or Jonah Goldberg want to call it). Russell Kirk wrote that any true conservative would be a socialist before he would be a libertarian. But then he was a Burkean High Church conservative.
The rise of triple fundamentalism on the American right creates a crisis of political discourse in the United States. Back when conservatism was orthodox and traditional, rather than fundamentalist and counter-revolutionary, conservatives could engage in friendly debates with liberals, and minds on both sides could now and then be changed. But if your sect alone understands the True Religion and the True Constitution and the Laws of the Market, then there is no point in debate. All those who disagree with you are heretics, to be defeated, whether or not they are converted.
For their part, progressives have no idea of how to respond to the emergent right’s triple fundamentalism. Today it is the left, not the right, that is Burkean in America. Modern American liberalism is disillusioned, to the point of defeatism, by the frustration of the utopian hopes of 1960s liberalism in the Age of Reagan that followed and has not yet ended. Today it is liberals, not conservatives, who tend to be cautious and incremental and skeptical to a fault about the prospects for reform, while it is the right that wants to blow up the U.S. economy and start all over, on the basis of the doctrines of two Austrian professors and a Russian émigré novelist. Barack Obama, who would have flourished in an age when conservatives and liberals shared a common Burkean sensibility, finds himself as baffled and flustered by the tribunes of the Tea Party as Edmund Burke would have been by the young Marjoe Gortner.
The era of triple fundamentalism on the American right is bound to come to an end. Sooner or later, dogmatism and reality will collide, and it is not reality that will crumple like tinfoil. The only question is how much damage will be done to the American polity before the revolution of the saints fizzles out.

Good Week

Benedito Ubiratã

Benedito Ubirata Benedito Ubirata

I lived to write this text. I studied in the 90’s with a famous professor of Structural Geology in the UK. Teacher Colsgrove it took to come to Brazil and taught us that class. The explanation of his coming to Brazil was given by my teacher the other Brazilian Sadovisk a Structural Geology Professor, I have always answered many questions outside the classroom. And the question was simple as Professor Colsgrove was in Brazil, where Brazilian teacher then said that because of the new trend of the former first minister Mrs. Thatcher’s Britain was cutting expenses of all kinds, they were running out of its colonies, and its economy needed to adapt. In this case the teacher was following the trend laboratories were Englishmen who seek resources for their research internationally. I laughed a little because he was seeking funds in Brazil, but I let it go. I did not understand very well how things worked back then. But what I realized is that fetch line of research was not what he was doing but rather resources to increase technical reserve your lab with agreements with the government visited. Professor Sadovski this case was the host of Brazil. If the economy improved English can be said that there are reflexes, but the strongest reflection is the literature of 1920 on the English nobility by the regionalist English writer W. Somerset Maugham in your novel The Razor’s Edge of the time over the bourgeoisie and the nobility and your expenses in that decade. And the nobility today as she lives, in this case controlling your spending so you do not encumber the coffers of the UK. If I mistake not even have a movie about Queen Elizabeth 2 clearly demonstrates that this new trend of the economy and spending cuts.

In this text of the New York Times, I believe that if the former mayor of New York Bloonberg the Lord is right in what he mentioned last year that the U.S. Congress their congressmen are not able to read, is now one year after they are reading the text is didactic as well as a bridge (analogy) the willingness of the Republican party to cut public spending in the country. The history of the Lady Margaret Thatcher as Prime Minister of the UK is very strong when it comes to cutting spending and reducing the tendency of a decadent society that squandered in public spending.

What is unclear is the adaptation that taxes should be high or low class for richer or poor. That is, when it comes to Margaret Thatcher is that she made no apology for taxes in his time, but the cuts in public spending. This claim is already becoming global. In Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel the current fight with your audience to review the condition of super tax on businesses or industries. All this as they fought to be able to contain the “industry to make taxes” to lessen the heavy awareness of actions not well accepted in society.

Read full text:

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/05/the-legend-of-margaret-thatcher/

July 5, 2011, 6:00 am

The Legend of Margaret Thatcher

By BRUCE BARTLETT
Today's Economist

Bruce Bartlett held senior policy roles in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations and served on the staffs of Representatives Jack Kemp and Ron Paul.

Former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher of Britain, here in 2008, is venerated by many conservative Republicans in the United States.Former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher of Britain, here in 2008, is venerated by many conservative Republicans in the United States.

Republicans have always admired former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher of Britain. Her 1979 election excited them enormously; Republicans viewed it as proof that their views were on the upswing and greatly increased their confidence that Ronald Reagan would be elected president in 1980 as part of a worldwide conservative trend.
Mrs. Thatcher’s stature among the American right has only increased since she was ousted by her own party in 1990. This is especially true now. Benjy Sarlin of Talking Points Memo says Mrs. Thatcher “has always been a popular figure in Republican circles across the pond, but she seems to have taken on a new relevance in recent years for the party’s leading lights.”
Mr. Sarlin cites a blog post on Mitt Romney’s Web site that draws a parallel between economic conditions in Britain in the late 1970s and those in America today. He reports that Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum also invoke Thatcher’s name frequently in their quest for the Republican presidential nomination. And last month, Sarah Palin publicly requested a meeting with Thatcher that fell through because of Mrs. Thatcher’s physical condition.
While Mrs. Thatcher is a towering figure in British political history, well deserving of admiration, the conservative legend about her time in power is at odds with the facts. In this legend, she was even more aggressive than Reagan in cutting taxes and the welfare state. But that is not true.

As this table shows, taxes as a share of the gross domestic product in Britain actually increased sharply during Mrs. Thatcher’s first seven years in office before falling in the later years. Even at the end, they were significantly higher than they were when she took office. Spending also rose during her first seven years before falling in Mrs. Thatcher’s later years.

Institute for Fiscal Studies

To those familiar with Mrs. Thatcher’s tax policies, these data are not surprising. Although she cut the top personal income tax rate to 60 percent from 83 percent immediately upon taking office, the basic tax rate was only reduced to 30 percent from 33 percent. And in 1980, the 25 percent lower rate of taxation was eliminated so that 30 percent became the lowest tax rate.
More importantly, Mrs. Thatcher paid for her 1979 tax cut by nearly doubling the value-added tax to 15 percent, from 8 percent. Among those who thought Mrs. Thatcher was making a dreadful mistake was the American economist Arthur Laffer. Writing in The Wall Street Journal on Aug. 20, 1979, he excoriated her for taking with the one hand while giving with the other.
“The Thatcher budget lowers tax rates where they have little economic consequence and raises tax rates where they affect economic activity directly,” he complained.
In the 1982 forward to the British edition of his American best-seller, “Wealth and Poverty,” George Gilder was also highly critical of Mrs. Thatcher for failing to cut either taxes or spending: “The net effect of the Thatcher program has been a substantial increase in taxation on virtually all taxpayers.”
Although Mrs. Thatcher privatized many British industries and businesses that had been nationalized after World War II and sold off much of Britain’s public housing, in which the bulk of the working class lived, she did little to reduce the size of the nation’s welfare state.
In particular, Mrs. Thatcher, like all the members of her party, strongly supported the National Health Service, which provides national health insurance for every Briton.
A review of long-term spending trends in Britain by the Institute for Fiscal Studies shows that Mrs. Thatcher basically flattened a trajectory that had been rising since the war. That took a lot of political effort even though her party controlled Parliament and the prime minister of Britain has far fewer constitutional constraints than an American president. But at the end of the Thatcher era, the welfare state was still intact.
As Martin Wolf, a columnist for The Financial Times, told me, “Like all great politicians, Thatcher was a pragmatist, not an ideologue, who picked her fights carefully. She recognized that any head-on attack on the welfare state would have destroyed the party’s electability.”
Mr. Wolf said Mrs. Thatcher was far more concerned about fiscal stability and deficit reduction than lower taxes, and the idea that a debt default “would have been sensible would, to her, have been insane.”
Mrs. Thatcher, like Reagan, moved her country in a conservative direction. But Mrs. Thatcher’s fiscal accomplishments were much more modest than many of today’s Republicans think.
The lesson they should learn from her is that it is very hard to shrink the size of government even when a strong leader has complete control of the legislature, that it takes many years of arduous work to do so and that at the end of the day it won’t shrink very much.
If the first Russian president Dmitri Medmedev announced months ago that the world could return to the 80, leaving it as a calling. And then the Russian General Andrei Makarov announces the call back to the 80s. I believe the Republican Party is already in North American racing back to see if this saves big phase in your country. It is speculated that in Germany the call of Mr. Makarov was heard, as the youth movements have begun to move in the same way as young people moved in the 80’s. Making and using large public meetings to large festivals and concerts.
In terms of public administration I remember that internal debt and external debt, was all that was said too.
——————————————————————————————

Good Week

Benedito Ubiratã

Advertisement
What your friends are reading on AlterNet