<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What’s Next for Occupy Wall Street?</title> <atom:link href="http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2012/02/13/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-occupy-wall-street/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2012/02/13/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-occupy-wall-street/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:09:24 -0700</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: SpectateS</title><link>http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2012/02/13/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-occupy-wall-street/#comment-61698</link> <dc:creator>SpectateS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:18:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/?p=26598#comment-61698</guid> <description>I have been Occupying political forums for years. With Video. 3 towns enacted and enforced resolutions preventing citizen video of open council meetings. Obviously they didn&#039;t like their words being spread out on the net. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Occupy the Chamber of Commerce meetings; they are the reason we get such low caliber candidates. They have been putting on and fixing political forums for years. They plant questions and are in charge of what is asked. Just to get their pro business candidates elected.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoWNdF_kUCA&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...&lt;/a&gt; (2Min 2Sec) video from the last civic forum&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They asked should the corporate vote be reinstated. 3 of the 4 elected councilors thought so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our citizen group had a list of 165 questions we had hoped the candidates would pick from the hat. That didn&#039;t happen. 3 known in advance questions were answered 13 times. Occupy these creeps too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Real Name: Doug Pederson AKA SpectateSwamp</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been Occupying political forums for years. With Video. 3 towns enacted and enforced resolutions preventing citizen video of open council meetings. Obviously they didn&#39;t like their words being spread out on the net.</p><p>Occupy the Chamber of Commerce meetings; they are the reason we get such low caliber candidates. They have been putting on and fixing political forums for years. They plant questions and are in charge of what is asked. Just to get their pro business candidates elected.</p><p><a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoWNdF_kUCA" rel="nofollow"></a><a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.." rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v..</a>. (2Min 2Sec) video from the last civic forum</p><p>They asked should the corporate vote be reinstated. 3 of the 4 elected councilors thought so.</p><p>Our citizen group had a list of 165 questions we had hoped the candidates would pick from the hat. That didn&#39;t happen. 3 known in advance questions were answered 13 times. Occupy these creeps too.</p><p>Real Name: Doug Pederson AKA SpectateSwamp</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mc.murphy</title><link>http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2012/02/13/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-occupy-wall-street/#comment-61695</link> <dc:creator>mc.murphy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:27:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/?p=26598#comment-61695</guid> <description>Odious piece of Democratic party gatekeeper propaganda, so removed from the consciousness of globally similar movements it would boggle the mind for it to have been given space were it not that Alternet itself is a gatekeeper for the other wing of the corrupt, status quo political machine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Disgraceful!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least, in comparison, some shreds of respect for the movement remain, while here we only get served little more than what amounts to self serving disdain and cynicism.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Compare and contrast with the two articles at CD today: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/02/13-4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.commondreams.org/vi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/02/13-6&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.commondreams.org/vi...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odious piece of Democratic party gatekeeper propaganda, so removed from the consciousness of globally similar movements it would boggle the mind for it to have been given space were it not that Alternet itself is a gatekeeper for the other wing of the corrupt, status quo political machine.</p><p>Disgraceful!</p><p>At least, in comparison, some shreds of respect for the movement remain, while here we only get served little more than what amounts to self serving disdain and cynicism.</p><p>Compare and contrast with the two articles at CD today: <br
/><a
href="http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/02/13-4" rel="nofollow"></a><a
href="http://www.commondreams.org/vi.." rel="nofollow">http://www.commondreams.org/vi..</a>.<br
/><a
href="http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/02/13-6" rel="nofollow"></a><a
href="http://www.commondreams.org/vi.." rel="nofollow">http://www.commondreams.org/vi..</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: oregoncharles</title><link>http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2012/02/13/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-occupy-wall-street/#comment-61694</link> <dc:creator>oregoncharles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:48:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/?p=26598#comment-61694</guid> <description>This is a conscious and thoroughly offensive effort to co-opt Occupy as a faction of the Democratic Party.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They&#039;re much more likely to ally with the Green Party, if they participate in electoral politics at all.&lt;br&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a conscious and thoroughly offensive effort to co-opt Occupy as a faction of the Democratic Party.</p><p>They&#39;re much more likely to ally with the Green Party, if they participate in electoral politics at all.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.alternet.org @ 2012-05-23 20:51:50 -->
