<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: $547 Million Can&#8217;t Paper Over Failure of Afghanistan War</title> <atom:link href="http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/09/02/547-million-cant-paper-over-failure-of-afghanistan-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/09/02/547-million-cant-paper-over-failure-of-afghanistan-war/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 16:53:27 -0700</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: paul_c</title><link>http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/09/02/547-million-cant-paper-over-failure-of-afghanistan-war/#comment-36865</link> <dc:creator>paul_c</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:29:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/?p=15675#comment-36865</guid> <description>A Billion dollars for psy-ops, with half of it spent against US??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Holy shit, we are under attack by our own Military!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where in the Constitution does it say the Military can or should drive public opinion to support their own agenda??  Isn&#039;t that politics??  Isn&#039;t that the definition of the Civilian Sector??  Isn&#039;t it the intention of the Constitution that the Military serve at the behest of Civilian Leadership, not the other way around??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is treason!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;peace,&lt;br&gt;Paul</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Billion dollars for psy-ops, with half of it spent against US??</p><p>Holy shit, we are under attack by our own Military!</p><p>Where in the Constitution does it say the Military can or should drive public opinion to support their own agenda??  Isn&#39;t that politics??  Isn&#39;t that the definition of the Civilian Sector??  Isn&#39;t it the intention of the Constitution that the Military serve at the behest of Civilian Leadership, not the other way around??</p><p>This is treason!</p><p>peace,<br
/>Paul</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.alternet.org @ 2012-05-28 02:10:25 -->
