http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-25/ban...

Federally funded elections with no monetary input from Corporations or private interests would solve a lot of problems. No PAC, no union, no committee to do anything could contribute one dime to a politician or party.

Only live human registered voters can participate in any part of the election process.

The Supreme Court erred for very suspicious reasons when the old farts either got paid off or dithered themselves into thinking that Free Speech and Commercial Speech are the same thing. They are not.

A business has a license to sell a product or service, not political propaganda. They are not licensed to participate in the election process. Therefore they are guilty of operating without permit. No kidding.

If we want criminals prosecuted we have to hire people that aren't already owned by the corporations. We can do that. We'd better do that.

I will support any political party and candidate that supports Federally Funded Elections with the exclusion of all others except voters. How about you?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Geithner+a...

http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/fannie-fred...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31510813/ns/msnbc_t...

Unfortunately the government we pay for worships and works for them – not us.

If our government did the work we pay them to do, don't we see – they'd all be doing long hard time. The money they stole and the industries they shipped out would be siezed and returned to us. But under those ideal conditions that we were taught were actual, these lying and swindling parasites would not have had the balls to rip us off with the magnitude they did – or ship away industries leaving their fellow citizens in the lurch…this global debacle would NOT have occured because even these insolent idiots would have had respect for a law that was really law because it was justice for ALL.

We have become 'Les Miserables'

And will continue to do so because they own the institutional regulators. Goldmans' $800M presidential campaign contribution to Obama had nothing to do with aspirations to redeeming social or economic justice.

“…our financial system is doomed to repeat the same excesses and abuses we’ve seen over the past decade.”

This is overwhelmingly clear. The gravy train to investment bankings' large investors requires a Fed policy of quantitative easing to maintain the grossly artificial valuations underpinning business investment. There are only two potential scenarios, and the deflationary option which fast tracks valuations to reality is simply politically untenable for either so-called party. It's a tough, multi-decade slog recovering from a deflationary depression with unemployment topping 35% and the associated nightmarish complications of social instability.

Rather, time is bought through a period of inflationary maintenance of artificial valuation until that too collapses the economy in a firestorm of hyperinflation. From the governmental viewpoint, you don't seriously fuck with the institutions that you'll need to transition to the next monetary regime.

Meanwhile, sacrificial goats will occasionally be paraded through the criminal courts, but only because they've conveniently overstepped in their greedy excesses.